About Me

Name: John Wallace
Email: john@grayrider.org Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Plan for Potent Acts of Civic Resistance: Continental Congress 2009 Update

The delegates to Continental Congress 2009 are preparing Instructions to State and Federal Officials. They are also working on developing a plan of Potent Acts of Civic Resistance."

After a week of intense committee deliberations, sometimes extending well into the early morning hours, the first formal resolutions of Continental Congress 2009 have begun to emerge. On Tuesday, the Congress adopted resolutions aimed to ending the federal income tax fraud and terminating all state and federal firearms regulations as de facto violations of the plain language of the Second Amendment.

As each of these first resolutions was adopted by the Assembly, they were loudly and spontaneously celebrated by the assembled Delegates, with jubilant energy and great emotion at the emergence of these first acts of nationally organized resistance to emerge from the Congress.

If these initial resolutions are any indication, the Congress clearly has set its collective intent to adopting a volume of provocative and far-reaching "Remedial Instructions" and "Civic Actions" to restore the Constitution, and which effects will soon reverberate from sea-to-shining-sea.

The Income Tax Instruction to the United States Congress adopted by the Continental Congress2009 cites several essential facts in U.S. law, including irrefutable documentation establishing that the 16th Amendment is void due to its failure to be properly ratified, and that any direct, un-apportioned tax on the labor of any American is wholly unconstitutional.

The resolution cites the U.S. Supreme Court holding that labor (and the fruits thereof) are, ".the most sacred and inviolable" property of the citizens of the nation. (Citing Butcher's Union Co. v. Crescent City Co., 111 U.S. 746, 757)

The tax resolution also calls for Congress to execute the immediate cessation of the (unlawful) imposition of the practice of withholding of earnings from the paychecks of American citizens and for the Congress to immediately release and restore all citizens wrongfully imprisoned as a result of the "unconstitutional application of the income tax" (laws).

The Civic Actions recommended by the Congress for the People to end the Income Tax fraud include for the People to contact their local sheriff and demand cooperation with the citizenry to provide protection from (unlawful) federal and state tax enforcement actions (including fraudulent, non-judicial "administrative" IRS liens and levys), that citizens prepare to replace or otherwise recall or impeach any sheriff who refuses to protect their local citizens from ".rogue federal agents acting under color of law," and for citizens to prepare themselves to withhold their monies as a means to secure Redress.

As to the Second Amendment Right to Keep and Bear Arms, the resolution of the Continental Congress declares that all regulations, state and federal, which are repugnant to the express language of the Second Amendment are ".null and void - including but not limited to, illegal and unconstitutional restrictions on open and/or concealed carry."
The arms resolution calls for the citizenry to coordinate with their local county Sheriff in establishing a Constitutional Militia, inherently separate from the state National Guard. Such militia would be a constitutional defense force, "comprising all citizenry capable of bearing arms and under proper authority, in defense of themselves and the states."

Official copies of these resolutions and others will be released shortly for public inspection and distribution. Committee and sub-committee work on "Remedial Instructions" for state and federal officials will by decree, end at midnight Wednesday (Nov. 18).

Today, (Thursday) , the Congress began two and a half days of intense deliberations. The delegates will be turning their sole attention to debating and adopting a comprehensive set of potent "Civic Actions" every American can implement, en masse, to effect a peaceful restoration of Constitutional Order.

These lawful, (non-violent) civic actions, (fully lawful and protected by the Right to enforce the First Amendment Right to Petition), will be designed to significantly affect the functioning of both state and federal institutions which have been complicit in enabling or otherwise aiding or allowing the destruction of the Constitution and/or the Fundamental Rights of the People.

On Saturday afternoon, the agenda plans for the Delegates set to move to adopt the full package consisting of First Amendment Petitions for Redress of Grievances, "Remedial Instructions" to be served upon state and federal officials, and the slate of "Civic Actions" designed for everyday Americans to implement to resist the tyrants and engage in the battle to restore Liberty.

The final package generated by the Congress will be formally known as the "Articles of Association" and signed (Saturday afternoon) by the Delegates of Continental Congress 2009. Means are currently being developed for citizens everywhere across America to likewise sign the Articles of Association and join the battle to hold our government accountable to the Law.

The current intent for the Articles of Association is that when "x" million (tbd) Americans publicly commit to personally embrace and execute at least some portion of the (peaceful) plan of Civic resistance, the plan of "Civic Actions" will be fully activated and its full effects soon manifest against our errant institutions of government. More details will be announced following the conclusion of the CC2009 assembly on November 21.

By: John Wallace
Delegate from New York
Chatham, New York
518-441-5139 518-441-5139
www.4FLS.com


RESOURCES/CONTACT LINKS:

List of Seated CC2009 Delegates
http://www.cc2009.us/delegates

Schedule of Events & Speakers
http://www.cc2009.us/schedule
(being updated daily)

Watch the Livestream and Rebroadcasts at:
www.givemeliberty.org/cc2009
www.freedom.tv/live

Live Audio Stream
http://www.freedom.tv/live/livestream.pls

Access Archives & Supporting Documentation at:
www.cc2009.us/archives
(being updated daily)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

AMERICAN PEOPLE DRAW A LINE IN THE SAND - CC2009 UPDATE

The American People are Drawing a Line in the Sand

CONTINENTAL CONGRESS 2009 UPDATE

FROM JOHN WALLACE - NY DELEGATE

We have just passed the half way mark for the Continental Congress of 2009. Here is what's happening:

Beyond Elections.
Beyond Petitions.
Beyond Tea Parties.

ST. CHARLES, IL - The first time free people assembled as a Congress of the People for such a critical point in the nation's history was in 1774 in Philadelphia. Over 230 years later 116 Delegates from 48 states have convened a modern day Continental Congress to exercise popular sovereignty and restore self-governance to the people of America.

The twelve day Congress is being broadcast live via streaming webcast at:
www.cc2009us.com, www.givemeliberty.org/cc2009, www.freedom.tv/live
from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. CDT through Saturday Nov 22nd.

The Citizen nominated and elected Delegates, all passionate about holding our servant government accountable to this nation's founding documents, have been meeting together day and night since Wednesday November 11th, generating a written and digital record for the history books. Despite the devastation across the US and the world as a result of our government's pervasive and unconstitutional acts, the Delegates have been quick to assert that the People have only themselves to blame for allowing these continued and escalating Constitutional violations.

Thus the Delegates are in the process of "drawing a line in the sand" and have convened this Continental Congress to end the nation's distress and restore the Republic form of self-governance that made America the most innovative and prosperous nation on earth.

The format for the Congress includes two sessions per day with guest speakers and documentary films to illustrate for all audiences how unlawful billion dollar bailouts, federal spending via limitless debt that enslaves our children, trillions spent on unconstitutional wars in places most Americans can't find on a map or tell you why we are there, the Bill of Rights -- intended to protect our God-given individual rights as a free people -- is now ignored on a daily basis, and has eradicated our Republic.

In addition, the Delegates have established Committees for each major area of violation, charged with drafting Remedial Instructions to be formally served upon both the Federal Government and each State's legislature. Delegates are quick to point out that these Instructions will be accompanied by a pro-active, peaceful mass movement of Civic Actions that all Americans can readily implement in order to ensure complicity from this and future servant government officials.

Here is a list of some of the committees:

WAR POWERS CLAUSES

GUN CONTROL LAWS

FEDERAL INCOME TAX

FEDERAL RESERVE

USA PATRIOT ACT

ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION

NORTH AMERICAN UNION - NAFTA


The Committees have been meeting and debating during breaks and late into the evening and early morning hours each night. For approximately four hours per day, the Delegates convene formally via the live webcast in a public forum to deliberate and vote, one vote per state, and adopt proposed Instructions and Civic Actions brought forth by the Committees. Participants and supporters cite that any individual right that is not enforceable is no right at all.

Before next week, CC2009 will deliver to the American People a viable "sword" with which to "slay" the dragons of tyranny that have become a cancer unto our nation.

Out of CC2009 will emerge a compelling record of the violations of Fundamental Rights our People now suffer, a well articulated set of "Remedial Instructions" to literally direct government officials to execute under pain of mass resistance, and a volume of viable, practical and creative "Civic Actions" every one of the We the People may take en masse, to hold the Government accountable to our Law, and our Constitution.

Let us give our nation, our friends, and our families hope that the promise of our Founding Fathers has not yet been lost. If we join together in sufficient num bers, and embrace a peaceful, cogent, and unified plan of resistance with which to engage our oppressors, our individual acts in the defense of Liberty will no doubt serve to shortly free us again, just as our Founders once succeeded.

As we look forward to the approaching Thanksgiving holiday, let us endeavor to make Continental Congress the discussion du jour at dinner tables across our nation, while we embrace its promise within our hearts, giving thanks and remembrance for the Divine gifts of Liberty that we both enjoy, and as Citizens, are obligated to defend.

The non-partisan, non-political event has been organized by the We The People Foundation for Constitutional Education (http://www.cc2009.us/about-wtp/we-the-people-articles-and-bylaws) and is the next appropriate step an ongoing 14-year process to hold state and federal elected officials directly accountable to the federal Constitution by enforcing the Petition Clause of the First Amendment.

Please see the update about CC2009 from the We The People Foundation here:
http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/UPDATE/Update2009-11-15.htm

Photos:
http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/PROJECTS/09-Congress/PR-images1/154b.jpg
http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/PROJECTS/09-Congress/PR-images1/155.jpg
http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/PROJECTS/09-Congress/PR-images1/162.jpg
http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/PROJECTS/09-Congress/PR-images1/162.jpg
http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/PROJECTS/09-Congress/PR-images1/CC2009070.jpg
http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/PROJECTS/09-Congress/PR-images1/11_12_4small.jpg
http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/PROJECTS/09-Congress/PR-images1/137.jpg
http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/PROJECTS/09-Congress/PR-images1/11_12_2small.jpg

Media requests for interviews and credentials can be directed to:
cc2009@admospheres.com This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it or by calling Todd McGreevy, Media Relations at 563-650-0120 563-650-0120 563-650-0120 563-650-0120 563-650-0120 563-650-0120 563-650-0120 563-650-0120 .

RESOURCES/LINKS:

List of Seated CC2009 Delegates
http://www.cc2009.us/delegates

Schedule of Events & Speakers
http://www.cc2009.us/schedule
(being updated daily)

Watch the Livestream and Rebroadcasts at:
www.givemeliberty.org/cc2009
www.freedom.tv/live

Live Audio Stream
http://www.freedom.tv/live/livestream.pls

Access Archives & Supporting Documentation at:
www.cc2009.us/archives
(being updated daily)

FOR FREEDOM, LIBERTY AND SOVEREIGNTY,

JOHN
__________________________
John Wallace
NY-Delegate
518-392-7062 518-392-7062
www.4FLS.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

AMERICAN GUN CONTROL ACT OF 1968 COPIED DIRECTLY FROM NAZI GUN LAW

The following is based on information from the Jews for Prevention of Firarms ownership. Are you tired of being told that "gun control" is a chronic pain that you have to accept because there's no cure? Do you -- a law abiding person -- want to be free: to own whichever firearms you want to own, regardless of where in America you live; from waiting periods, gun bans, magazine capacity restrictions, etc.; to spend your time on the range or in the field, rather than fighting "gun control"? Are you tired of giving hard earned bucks to efforts that have at best only slowed the gun grabbers' push toward firearms registration and confiscation?



If you have had enough of death by a thousand cuts, you are ready to take action to wipe out "gun control" -- now. Members of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO) consider "gun control" to be an aggressive cancer. JPFO has a cure, a way to destroy "gun control". JPFO has hard evidence that shows that the Nazi Weapons Law (March 18, 1938) is the source of the U.S Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA '68). Adolph Hitler signed the Nazi Weapons Law.



The Gestapo (Nazi National Secret Police) enforced it. In "Gun Control": Gateway to Tyranny we present the official German text of the Nazi Weapons Law and a side-by-side translation into English. Even more deadly: a side-by-side, section-by-section comparison of the GCA '68 with the Nazi Weapons Law. If you have this in your hands, no one can tell you that you're imagining things. The clincher: JPFO knows who implanted into American law cancerous ideas from the Nazi Weapons Law. The likely culprit is a former senator, now deceased.



We have documentary proof -- see below -- that he had the original text of the Nazi Weapons Law in his possession 4 months before the bill that became GCA '68 was signed into law. This former senator was a senior member of the U.S. team that helped to prosecute Nazi war criminals at Nuremberg, Germany, in 1945-46. That is probably where he found out about the Nazi Weapons Law. He may have gotten a copy of it then, or at a later date. We cannot imagine why any U.S. lawmaker would own original texts of Nazi laws. To find out his name, read on. With this hard evidence in your hands and in your head, you can destroy cancerous "gun control".



You can challenge anyone who backs "gun control". You can show them the Nazi ideas, line by line. The parallels between the Nazi law and GCA '68 will leap at you from the page. For example, law abiding firearm owners in Illinois, Massachusetts and New Jersey must carry identification cards based on formats from the Nazi Weapons Law. Nazi based laws have no place in America. Thousands of Americans died or were wounded in the war to wipe out the Nazis. They did not suffer or die so that Hitler's ideas could live on in America and kill more Americans.



Remember Killeen, Texas! The 23 who died in Luby's Cafeteria there died because they obeyed Nazi inspired "gun control" laws. The law forced them, unarmed, to face an armed madman. To destroy "gun control" before more law abiding Americans are murdered by criminals or madmen helped by "gun control", you need to get hold of the evidence as presented in "Gun Control": Gateway to Tyranny.



You can then challenge the media, the most aggressive backers of "gun control". Ask media personalities in your city or town why they back Nazi based laws. You can help to erase "gun control", Hitler's last legacy. GCA '68 puts your life at risk right now. You have a constitutional civil right to be armed in order to protect yourself, because under U.S law the police have no duty to protect the average person: "There is no constitutional right to be protected by the state (or Federal) against being murdered by criminals or madmen. It is monstrous if the state fails to protect its residents against such predators but it does not violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, or, we suppose, any other provision of the Constitution.



The Constitution is a charter of negative liberties: it tells the state (gov't) to let people alone; it does not require the federal government or the state to provide services, even so elementary a service as maintaining law and order" (Bowers v. DeVito, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, 686F.2d 616 [1982]). The Supreme Court last dealt with this issue in 1856; the 1982 decision states the position in modern language. The laws of virtually every state parallel federal law (see JPFO Special Report Dial 911 and Die! covered in Guns & Ammo, July 1992).


This has been so ever since the Constitution was adopted in 1791. As a result, the framers of the Second Amendment deliberately created (guaranteed) an individual civil right to be armed. It is your only reliable defense against criminals. GCA '68 ties your hands and keeps you from carrying out your legal duty to ensure your own self defense. GCA '68 thus undermines a pillar of U.S. law and helps criminals to kill law abiding Americans. Hitler would be pleased.



Thus, GCA '68 marked a new approach to "gun control". It replaced the Federal Firearms Act (June 30, 1938), which was based on the federal power to regulate interstate commerce. The 1938 law required firearms dealers to get a federal license (which then cost $1). Only dealers could ship firearms across state lines. Ordinary people could receive shipments from dealers. In GCA '68 the government required that in almost all cases only dealers could send and receive firearms across state lines. This ended "mail order" sales of firearms by law abiding persons who are not licensed dealers. GCA '68 hits you even harder. Congress gave federal bureaucrats in Washington D.C., the power to decide what kinds of firearms you can own.



The framers of GCA '68 borrowed an idea -- that certain firearms are "hunting weapons" -- from the Nazi Weapons Law (Section 21 and Section 32 of the Regulations, page 61 and page 73, respectively, of "Gun Control": Gateway to Tyranny). The equivalent U.S. term, "sporting purpose," was used to classify firearms. But it was not defined anywhere in GCA '68. Thus, bureaucrats were empowered to ban whole classes of firearms. They have, in fact, done so.



We wanted to know the source of these new ideas. On reading "Dial 911 and Die!" a JPFO member told us he had seen an article -- by Alan Stang in 'Review of the News,' October 4, 1967 (pages 15-20) -- the author of which felt that the Nazi Weapons Law was the model for GCA '68. We found the article. But Stang did not reproduce the Nazi law, so we could not check his conclusions. We started to hunt for the text of the Nazi Weapons Law. We eventually found it, in the law library of an Ivy League university. Until 1943-44, the German government published its laws and regulations in the 'Reichsgesetzblatt,' roughly the equivalent of the U.S. Federal Register.



Carefully shelved by law librarians, the 1938 issues of this German government publication had gathered a lot of dust. In the 'Reichsgesetzblatt' issue for the week of March 21, 1938, was the official text of the Weapons Law (March 18, 1938). It gave Hitler's Nazi party a stranglehold on the Germans, many of whom did not support the Nazis. We found that the Nazis did not invent "gun control" in Germany. The Nazis inherited gun control and then perfected it: they invented handgun control. The Nazi Weapons Law of 1938 replaced a Law on Firearms and Ammunition of April 13, 1928. The 1928 law was enacted by a center-right, freely elected German government that wanted to curb "gang activity," violent street fights between Nazi party and Communist party thugs.



All firearm owners and their firearms had to be registered. Sound familiar? "Gun control" did not save democracy in Germany. It helped to make sure that the toughest criminals, the Nazis, prevailed. The Nazis inherited lists of firearm owners and their firearms when they 'lawfully' took over in March 1933. The Nazis used these inherited registration lists to seize privately held firearms from persons who were not "reliable." Knowing exactly who owned which firearms, the Nazis had only to revoke the annual ownership permits or decline to renew them.



In 1938, five years after taking power, the Nazis enhanced the 1928 law. The Nazi Weapons Law introduced handgun control. Firearms ownership was restricted to Nazi party members and other "reliable" people. The 1938 Nazi law barred Jews from businesses involving firearms. On November 10. 1938 -- one day after the Nazi party terror squads (the SS) savaged thousands of Jews, synagogues and Jewish businesses throughout Germany -- new regulations under the Weapons Law specifically barred Jews from owning any weapons, even clubs or knives.



Given the parallels between the Nazi Weapons Law and the GCA '68, we concluded that the framers of the GCA '68 -- lacking any basis in American law to sharply cut back the civil rights of law abiding Americans -- drew on the Nazi Weapons Law of 1938. Finding the Nazi Weapons Law whetted our appetite. We wanted to know who implanted this Nazi cancer in America. We began by probing the backgrounds of lawmakers who championed "gun control". We focused on those whose bills became part of GCA '68. GCA '68 as enacted closely tracks proposals dating to August 1963.



We felt that if the culprit were a lawmaker -- or a congressional staffer -- he or she would know Germany, German law and possibly even speak German. He or she probably would have spent time in Germany on business or during military service. Alternatively, if the culprit were not a member of Congress or a staffer, there would be testimony at the hearings to that effect. Most potential suspects were quickly eliminated; they had no apparent ties to Germany. But one lawmaker caught our attention. An old "Who's Who" entry showed he had been a senior member of the U.S. team that prosecuted German war criminals at Nuremberg in 1945-46. Thus, he had lived in Germany just after the Nazi period. His official duties required him to look at Nazi records, including Nazi laws.



In 1963 he led the effort to greatly expand the Federal Firearms Act of 1938. We then got a break. We told a legal scholar of our findings. He was intrigued. He sent us an extract from the record of hearings held a few months prior to the enactment of GCA '68. At the end of June 1968, the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee to investigate Juvenile Delinquency -- chaired by Thomas J. Dodd (D-CT) -- held hearings on bills: (1) "To Require the Registration of Firearms" (S.3604). (2) "To Disarm Lawless Persons" (S.3634) and (3) "To Provide for the Establishment of a National Firearms Registry" (S.3637), among others. U.S. Representative John Dingell (D-MI) testified at these Senate hearings on "gun control". Senator Joseph D. Tydings (D-MD) chaired some of these hearings, in Dodd's absence.



Rep. Dingell expressed concern that if firearms registration were required, it might lead to confiscation of firearms, as had happened in Nazi Germany. Tydings angrily accused Rep. Dingell of using "scare tactics": "Are you inferring that our system here, gun registration or licensing, would in any way be comparable to the Nazi regime in Germany, where they had a secret police, and a complete takeover?" Rep. Dingell backed away. (Hearings before the Subcommittee to Investigate Juvenile Delinquency of the Committee on the Judiciary, 90th Congress, 2nd Session, June 26, 27 and 28 and July 8, 9 and 10. 1968, pp. 479-80, 505-6 cited as Subcommittee Hearings.)



Tydings later inserted into the hearing record various documents, "concerning the history of Nazism and gun confiscation." Exhibit No. 62 (see reproduction) is fascinating. This letter -- dated July 12, 1968 -- is to Subcommittee Chairman Dodd from Lewis C. Coffin, Law Librarian at the Library of Congress. Coffin wrote: " ... we are enclosing herewith a translation of the Law on Weapons of March 18, 1938, prepared by Dr. William Solyom-Fekete of [the European Law Division -- ed.] as well as the Xerox of the original German text which you supplied" (Subcommittee Hearings, p. 489, emphasis added). This letter makes it public knowledge that at the end of June 1968 -- 4 months before GCA '68 was enacted -- Senator Thomas J. Dodd, now deceased, personally owned a copy of the original German text of the Nazi Weapons Law.



Why did Dodd own the original German text of any Nazi law? Why did he make known that he owned it? The Library of Congress then had (and still has) the 'Reichsgesetzblatt' in its collection. The Library of Congress translator, Dr. Solyom-Fekete, could easily have used the Library of Congress' own copy. Any member of Congress who wanted to read the Nazi Weapons Law need only have asked for it to be produced from the shelves of the Library of Congress and for it to be translated by Library of Congress experts.



Why should any member of Congress ever have owned the original German text of the Nazi Weapons Law? Without access to Tom Dodd's personal papers, archived under his heirs' control, we unfortunately cannot offer definite answers. Dodd could have acquired the German text of the Nazi Weapons Law during his time at Nuremberg. But he had no need to do so. Dodd did not personally handle the prosecution of Nazi Interior Minister Wilhelm Frick, who signed the Nazi Weapons Law. The case against Frick was presented by Robert M.W. Kempner, Assistant Trial Counsel for the United States (see 'Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal,' cited as TMWC, Vol. V, pp. 352-67, Nuremberg, Germany, 1947). Nor should the Nazi Weapons Law otherwise have come to Dodd's attention.



The Nazi Weapons Law was not used as evidence against Frick (see Kempner's speech, TMWC, V, pp. 352-67 and 'Index of Laws, Decrees, Orders, Directives, and the Administration of Justice in Nazi Germany and Nazi Dominated Countries', TMWC, Vol. XXIII, pp. 430-33). The Nazi Weapons Law is not listed among documents submitted as evidence to the Tribunal by the American prosecutors (see Vol. XXIV, pp. 98-169). The prosecutors at Nuremberg doubtless knew of the Nazi Weapons Law. They probably saw it in the 'Reichsgesetzblatt.' On the same day that Nazi Interior Minister Frick signed the Weapons Law, March 18, 1938, he signed another law governing security measures in newly annexed Austria.



This law concerning Austria appeared in the 'Reichsgesetzblatt' -- directly in front of the Weapons Law -- and was introduced into evidence at Nuremberg ('Reichsgesetzblatt' 1938, I, p. 262; the Nazi Weapons Law was published in the same volume, p. 265; see TMWC, Vol. V, p.358 for reference to law concerning Austria). Thus, the Nazi Weapons Law appeared to have no historical merit at Nuremberg and should not have attracted anyone's notice, certainly not to the extent of causing anyone to want to keep a copy of it as a separate document.



If Dodd got his copy of the original German text of the Nazi Weapons Law during his time at Nuremberg, it likely was part of a collection of documents, for example, issues of the 'Reichsgesetzblatt'. But if he acquired the original German text of the Nazi Weapons Law after his service at Nuremberg, he must have done so for a very specific reason. The Nazi Weapons Law plainly did not figure at Nuremberg. We may safely conclude it had little, if any, interest for those interested in the history of the Nazis' rise to power. For example, the Nazi Weapons Law is not mentioned at all in William L. Shirer's very thorough study of Nazi Germany, 'The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich' (Simon and Schuster, New York, 1950).



At the hearings held by Dodd's subcommittee at the end of June 1968, Rep. Dingell had objected to the firearms registration provision then being discussed. Dodd may have offered his copy of the Nazi Weapons Law to show that the specific proposal did not resemble anything in the Nazi law. He may not have realized that he was revealing a broader truth; that the whole fabric of GCA '68 was based on the Nazi Weapons Law, even if the specific registration proposal was not so based. Alternatively, Dodd may not have cared whether or not anyone knew that he had the German text of the Nazi Weapons Law. He doubtless knew that months would pass before the hearing record was printed and so generally available for scrutiny.



Thus, even if anyone then noticed the parallels between the two laws, the bill would already have become law. Rep. Dingell does not appear to have pursued the matter: the firearms registration provision was not included in GCA '68. The Congress was stampeded on "gun control" by public enthusiasm. Martin Luther King had been murdered on April 4, 1968, and Robert F. Kennedy had been murdered on June 6, 1968.



We are not the first to have seen this hearing record. But we appear to be the first to have recognized its importance. This hearing record suggests strongly that the late Senator Thomas J. Dodd (D-CT) himself implanted the Nazi Weapons Law into American law, or, at very least, helped others to do so. Now you know the ugly truth about the roots of GCA '68. But you need to see -- with your own eyes -- the hard evidence of the Nazi roots of "gun control" in America presented in "Gun Control": Gateway to Tyranny. If you want to destroy "gun control", you can use this book to do it.


The Nazi Weapons Law of March 18, 1938, cleared the way for World War II and Nazi genocide against the Jews, Gypsies and 7,000,000 other people. The 1938 Nazi Weapons Law that disarmed, enslaved & murdered the men above, is alive and well in the United States, and is called, "The Gun Control act of 1968", and is enforced by the modern day Gestapo, known as the "Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE)."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

HISTORIC CONTINENTAL CONGRESS 2009 CONVENES IN THE USA

Wednesday, November 11, 2009 may one day be known as the day the American People convened, for the first time in over two centuries, an Assembly of representatives of the People in order to fully exercise of the "Capstone Right" -- i.e., the Petition clause of the First Amendment.
 
At approximately 3:00 pm Wednesday, WE THE PEOPLE Chairman Bob Schulz convened the Assembly to begin the selection of Congress officers from the ranks of elected Delegates who will preside over the 11-day long Assembly. Constitutional scholar and former Presidential candidate Michael Badnarik was selected as the presiding officer of the Congress while he was still a Delegate from Texas.
 
Following the ceremonial Liberty Banquet dinner at the St. Charles, Illinois Pheasant Run venue, the Delegates gathered in the main deliberation hall for the Opening Ceremony which was broadcast live. The song-centered ceremony featured presentation of the fifty state flags by the Delegates, as well as several patriotic group songs and inspirational prayers.
 
For over a decade, WTP Foundation has championed an intensive, well-researched and coherent effort to hold the Government accountable for its escalating violations of fundamental Rights and the Constitution through use of the Right of the People to "petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Those ongoing abuses include violations of the Constitution's tax, money, war, general welfare, privacy and other clauses that are at the heart of the conditions that now plague our nation. (See our Petitions for Redress)
 
Although the public has known little about the history or nature of the Right to Petition, scholarly and historical research has established without argument, that the Right, first articulated as the cornerstone of Western Law in Magna Carta (1215), provides the People an individual Right to hold Government peacefully accountable for its abuses. Far beyond the right to merely send "complaints" to the government (which are virtually ignored by all officials), the Right of Petition embodies the profound Right to enforce the Right to Petition by withdrawing support from the Government until Redress is secured.
 
Summaries of this important research can be reviewed as part of the legal pleadings of the 2004 landmark WTP lawsuit, We The People vs. United States, which sought to have the Judiciary declare - for the first time in history - the legal and constitutional meaning of the last ten words of the First Amendment. In 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear this controversial case involving the essence of Popular Sovereignty.
 
Continental Congress 2009 will take the process of holding the United States Government accountable and restoring the Constitution to the next level by first creating a formal record of the vast violations of the Constitution and Individual Rights now suffered by the People. Next, the Congress will debate and decide upon a series of practical but strong "Civic Actions" the People may take in order to restore their Liberty. The agenda for the CC2009 Assembly also provides for the development and adoption of formal "Remedial Instructions" to be served upon federal and state officials, in essence ordering them to cease and desist their official abuses and giving them formal Notice as to the "Civic Actions" of (peaceful) resistance the People may take, en masse, if those officials, yet again, choose to ignore the People's Petitions for Redress.
 
Here is a partial list of constitutional questions to be addressed by the CC2009:
 
1. Unalienable Rights of all US Citizens
2. Federal Reserve
3. Constitution and Bill of Rights
4. Tax Laws
5. Natural Born Citizen Clause
6. War Powers Acts
7. USA Patriot Act
8. Welfare Clause
9. Faithfully Execute Clause
10. National Sovereignty
11. Property Rights
12. Right to Bear Arms
 
Most of the CC2009 event can be viewed live each day at these links: www.GiveMeLiberty.org/CC2009 or at www.CC2009.us.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A WARNING TO STOP AMERICA'S MARCH TOWARDS THE NEW WORLD ORDER

The following is a comment on America's march towards the New World Order from a European perspective. The people of western Europe are warning us not to follow in their footsteps. It is a european perspective of their own plight and they are simply giving us a warning about ours.
It means that salvation of freedom and liberty for the free world may rest on our shoulders since we are just about the last ones left (except Australia and NZ) who have not lived under a dictatorship. Europe has fallen again WITHOUT A SINGLE SHOT BEING FIRED and it was all done with money. The following commentary is long, but well worth reading.
 
 ---------------------------------------
 
The Warning from our friends in Europe: National sovereignty in Europe - what little is left of it - was condemned to history this week with the signing of the 'Lisbon Treaty' that centralises power in the European Union like never before. The Rubicon has now been crossed and we enter full-blown tyranny. (just adding that there is a death penalty in that treaty for rebellion, protest marches and dissent; good bye freedom).
 
The final signature to the agreement was that of Vaclav Klaus, President of the Czech Republic, who had held out as long as he thought was possible. Klaus has been a vehement critic of the Treaty and he well knows what it means for European freedom and national sovereignty and identity. He is clearly a man who can see beyond the end of his nose and the garbage that must be daily put before him by officialdom, but when he swished his pen this week he was well aware that he was effectively signing away all rights for Europeans to decide their own national destiny and handing them to the dark-suits and dark minds in the EU bureaucracy in Brussels, Belgium.
 
The same is planned for North America, Africa and Asia-Australia-New Zealand and it is good to be streetwise about the methods and techniques employed to seize control of the sovereign nation state. What has been done to ensnare Europe is happening now around the world. The basic theme is encapsulated in a single quote 57 years ago by the 'Father of Europe', the Rothschild frontman, Jean Monnet. In the year I was born, he wrote this in a letter to a friend: 'Europe's nations should be guided towards the super-state without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an economic purpose, but will eventually and irreversibly lead to federation.' And so it was. This technique is called the Totalitarian Tiptoe. You move towards your goal in a series of many small steps and not in a few big leaps that would alert the population to what is going on.
 
The Illuminati Fabian Society, from where George Orwell and Aldous Huxley secured the information for their 'prophetic' books, 1984 and Brave New World, is even named after Fabius Maximus, a Roman general and dictator who mastered this technique of wearing down an opponent over time. It is captured visually by the Fabian Society logo - a wolf in sheep's clothing Today's centrally-controlled European dictatorship began life as the "European Coal and Steel Community" European Coal and Steel Community, established in 1951.
This integrated the coal and steel industries of France, West Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg and came from an 'idea' by Jean Monnet (tiptoe).
 
The six countries of the "European Coal and Steel Community" European Coal and Steel Community signed the Treaty of Rome in 1957 to create the 'EEC', the European Economic Community (tiptoe).
 
The EEC was enlarged in 1973 to include Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom. The UK's entry was promoted by Rothschild asset, Satanist and child-killer, Ted Heath, and the deal signed when he was Prime Minister (tiptoe).
 
The first direct and, allegedly, 'democratic' elections to the irrelevant European Parliament were held in 1973 in an attempt to hide the fact that the whole fascist/communist structure was controlled by unelected bureaucrats. Greece joined the EEC in 1981 followed by Spain and Portugal in 1986 (tiptoe).
 
The Schengen Agreement of 1985 opened the borders between most member states and a year later the 'Community' introduced its own flag (tiptoe).
 
The Schengen Agreement of 1985 opened the borders between most member states and a year later the 'Community' introduced its own flag (tiptoe).
 
The European Union was formally established when the Maastricht Treaty became law in 1993. It massively advanced the power of the bureaucrats and opened the way for the introduction of the single European currency, the euro (tiptoe).
 
The European Union expanded to include 27 member states with around 500 million people who have their lives dictated down to increasingly fine detail by faceless dark-suits and the hapless, ruthless and corrupt politicians they control (tiptoe).
 
Then came the final push to end the reign of the nation state in Europe as, in any way, a self-governing entity. This was the proposed European Constitution, produced by long-time Illuminati asset, the former French President, Valéry Giscard d'Estaing. It was he who had told the then Soviet President, Mikhail Gorbachev, in January 1989: 'Mr President, I cannot tell you exactly when it will happen - probably within 15 years - but Europe is going to be a federal state and you have to prepare yourself for that. You have to work out with us, and the European leaders, how you would react to that, how would you allow the other East European countries to interact with it or how to become a part of it, you have to be prepared.'
 
Giscard d'Estaing was meeting Gorbachev with David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger in a delegation from the Rothschild-controlled Trilateral Commission, an organisation officially co-founded by Rockefeller and Barack Obama mentor, Zbigniew Brzezinski.
 
The estimate of 'within 15 years' would have been pretty much spot on had they not made the mistake of actually giving the public a say in the Netherlands and France in 2005. Both populations rejected the Constitution in referendums because they could see what the implications were of the creation of a President of Europe, a European Foreign Minister and the vast erosion of national powers to veto and opt out of bureaucrat-dictated laws and regulations. What normally happens when referendums about the EU go the 'wrong way' is that they wait a while, pour resources, people and propaganda into the country, and then force another vote. This has happened a number of times. They could see with French and Dutch, however, that the feeling against the Constitution was so strong that this was not going to work. So, they simply changed the name of the document from the European Constitution to the Lisbon Treaty.
 
Some 98% of the content was the same, but they said that because it was now 'just' a treaty and not a constitution, it was not affected by the French and Dutch votes and the promise of the Blair government in Britain to 'guarantee' a public vote on the Constitution no longer applied. I will now go through the sequence of events that happened in Britain between then and this week. It is such a classic example of the way the system is manipulated and the people scammed by politicians who claim to be on different 'sides', but aren't. It is information that those in other countries would benefit from knowing, given that these techniques are universal and not confined to Britain.
 
Tony Blair, the then Prime Minister, and his Chancellor of the Exchequer, Gordon Brown, made their commitment to a public referendum on the European Constitution to help them win the General Election in May 2005, but then Brown, who replaced Blair as Prime Minister in 2007, said there would be no such public vote. Brown said outrageously (and following the agreed line throughout Europe) that the Treaty was significantly different from the Constitution and so his commitment to a referendum was not relevant. What he meant, as with other European leaders, like Mossad operative Sarkozy in France, is that they knew the populations would reject it whatever name you dressed it up with and so they were not going to be given the chance.
 
For those outside the UK, Gordon Brown leads (in theory) the Labour Party while the main 'opposition' is the Conservative Party, headed by David Cameron. Playing the mind games that they do, just like the Republicans and Democrats in the US, Cameron pledged a 'cast iron guarantee' that he would give the British people a referendum on the Treaty if he was voted into office. He did this with the confidence of someone who believed that the Treaty would be all done and dusted, in place and in operation, by the time he ever made it to Downing Street, but he had to placate public opinion and the many in his own party who oppose the further erosion of British sovereignty.
 
A spanner was thrown in this cosy little 'works', albeit sadly temporarily, by the only nation given a referendum on the Treaty - Ireland. Even the EU bully boys couldn't stop this because it was in the Irish Constitution that there had to be a public vote on such a transfer of power. It was thought that a 'yes' vote would be breeze, but the Irish voted 'no' in June 2008 and the Brussels toilet roll order did soar. Oh my God! Every country had to agree to the Treaty for it to become law and the truly useless Irish government of Brian Cowen could not do so in the light of the public decision.
 
While Cowen was given his orders to have another vote and get the right answer, more potential trouble was brewing in the UK. By the middle of 2008, just after the Irish referendum, Gordon Brown was in desperate trouble and potentially could have been forced out. His 'leadership' proved so inept that the plotters were gathering in his own party to get rid of him and this was highly likely to lead to a general election in which David Cameron would have been hot favourite to win. But hold on. The Irish vote had delayed the signing of the Lisbon Treaty by at least a year and Cameron had given his 'cast iron guarantee' to give the British people a referendum, one in which they would have voted 'no' by a considerably margin. Oh my God (2).
 
The only way to save the Treaty was to keep Brown in office until the Irish vote was overturned and the document passed into law. Enter Britain's Mr Sleaze and Slither, Peter Mandelson, the Rothschild bosom buddy, and the UK's version of Rahm Emanuel, Obama's handler and spinner and another operative for the Rothschilds. Mandelson can't stand Brown, but needs must from his point of view. If Brown's survival was required to save the Treaty, so be it. Mandelson was twice forced to resign from the Blair government amid allegations of corruption and went off to Brussels to become one of the dark-suit 'commissioners'. He made an enormous fortune from taxpayers' money and advanced the agenda for a pan-European dictatorship.
 
It was announced in October 2008, with Brown's leadership in disarray, that Mandelson had been appointed to the government as 'Business Secretary', just in time to take control of financial policy in the wake of the banking crisis orchestrated by his Rothschild masters and associates. There was the little matter that Mandelson was not an elected Member of Parliament, but that was no problem. He was simply made a 'Lord' which qualified him to attend the House of Lords and, in turn, allowed him to be appointed to government. No public vote necessary. Ain't 'democracy' great? Mandelson set about quelling the internal rebellion against Brown to keep him in office, ensuring that shocking amounts of money were squandered in bailing out the banks and accumulated extraordinary powers that gave him a place on 35 of the 43 Cabinet committees and subcommittees. Mandelson runs the British government to this day - in other words, the Rothschilds do.
 
Last month the Irish voted 'yes' in the re-run referendum on the Lisbon Treaty - an absolutely mind-boggling decision and testament to how easy it is for the few to control the many when the many are not conscious. What can you say about people who are so blatantly abused and insulted by having their first decision rejected by the EU tyranny and then vote again and agree to give control of their lives and their country to the very same EU tyranny. To those in Ireland who voted yes, and even more so to those who celebrated the 'victory' in the streets, I should remind you that you need to breathe every few seconds or you die. Don't forget, now. And a few people can't control the world??
 
The Irish 'yessers' were actually voting to dismantle their own country, hand complete control over anything that matters to Brussels bureaucrats and, irony of ironies, ensuring that they will never get the chance to vote again on increased EU powers because that right is deleted by the Lisbon Treaty. One man held out against the tide and that was Vaclav Klaus, President of the Czech Republic, who's idea appeared to be to delay signing on behalf of his country until Cameron came to office in the UK and triggered a referendum. It was never a plan because Cameron had no intention of scuppering the establishment. My goodness, he is the establishment. He has family ties to the Rothschilds, the world banking cartel and royalty. Cameron's great-great grandfather, Sir Ewen Cameron, helped the Rothschilds sell war bonds during the Russo-Japanese war and his great-grandfather, Emile Levita, a Jewish immigrant to Britain from Germany in 1850, was director of the London-based Chartered Bank of India, Australia and China. A family connection to King George III makes Cameron a fifth cousin of the Queen, twice removed. Cameron is also related to William IV. His immensely wealthy father-in-law is a direct descendant of Charles II and can trace his bloodline back to the Knights Templar and the Fifth Crusade. Yep, what a rebel Cameron must be.
 
The circle was completed on Wednesday when Cameron announced that, with Vaclav Klaus signing the Lisbon Treaty and its introduction planned within weeks, he was withdrawing his pledge to have a referendum on it, or European integration, if he wins the next election. Game, set and match. He announced that instead there would be a referendum on any future treaties and he would negotiate a return of (unspecified) powers to Britain. Is that a 'cast iron guarantee', Dave? But all this is nonsense and Cameron knows it. There will be no more treaties for the people to vote on - the Lisbon document is 'self-amending' and they can just add to it as they like. The return of powers already conceded to the EU is specifically forbidden by documents already signed.
 
The European Economic Community was lied into existence and it has been lied into its present state as the 'legal personality' of a 'country' called Europe. The 'nation states' are merely its regions. The ratification of the Lisbon Treaty means: The EU can negotiate and sign international treaties on behalf of the whole of Europe and establish a publicly-unelected President of Europe and Foreign Minister. EU judges have powers over 'justice' and policing for the first time, and the EU police force, Europol, will be able to instigate investigations in member states (regions). So-called 'ratchet clauses' allow the EU to increase the powers of the Brussels bureaucrats without any new treaties and thus anything now goes, basically.
 
Even without these further powers to be added in the future, the Lisbon Treaty deletes the ability of 'nation states' like Britain to veto EU legislation in 16 new areas, including transport. The EU can introduce a 'common defence policy' for Europe leading to the creation of a European army. It will be easier for the EU to force countries to accept 'asylum seekers' (whether genuine or not) and have a say, eventually the whole say, in what benefits are paid to them.
 
This was the week the nation state effectively ended in Europe and a tidal wave of new laws and regulations, long since written and waiting, are about to deluge the countries of Europe when the Lisbon Treaty comes into force in a few weeks. It has all been planned since at least the 19th century, probably long before that, and lying, cheating and deeply corrupt politicians and bureaucrats have ensured over the last 60 years that the nightmare became fact. In Europe at least, the game just changed to a whole new phase.
 
Learn the lesson North America, Africa, Asia, Australia and New Zealand. You are next in line. Don't let them do the same to you.
 
---------------
 
It's time for freedom loving Americans to stand up and resist the tyranny of our own government before it is too late. let's start by getting back to a constitutional republic. We need another Continental Congress to give our government a warning and instructions from the people. We can start with abolishing the Federal Reserve and removing its strangle hold on our country. For Freedom, Liberty and Sovereignty, John Wallace www.4FLS.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I AM AN AMERICAN: NOT A HYPHENATED AMERICAN

It seems that America has become a country obsessed with classifying its citizens into different racial and ethnic sub-groups. President Obama is routinely called the first Black president, but isn’t he also half white? To be more accurate, isn’t he really the first mixed race president? The media and special interest groups constantly refer to him as the Black president. Americans are constantly being bombarded by government and media reports of the first Hispanic person to do this, the first Asian person to do that, or the first Black person to do something else.

My message to the government bureaucrats, the special interest groups and the mass media is that the vast majority of Americans don’t care what a person’s race or ethnic origin is. Throughout our history, Americans of all races and ethnic backgrounds have fought and died as one people to preserve this country’s freedoms and liberties, not to separate us or divide us into racial and ethnic groups.

America has always been known as a country of rugged individualism based on individual freedom and liberty, not race and ethnic origin. Most Americans do not care if Black people comprise 12.1% of the population or 14.3%. They do not care if Hispanic people comprise 19% or 28% of the population. The Racial and Ethnic classification of Americans is nothing more than institutionalized racism and must be ended. Rather than helping a diverse population become assimilated and united as one nation, the Federal government is doing what the Nazi government of Germany did in the 1930’s and 40’s; creating government supported institutionalized racism by the intentional classification of it’s citizens by race and ethnicity.

Americans are also beginning to realize that racial and ethnic identification is more a matter of personal choice than anything else. In the 2000 Census, seven million American citizens refused to place themselves into a single category by refusing to describe themselves as only white, black, Asian, Latino or any one of the other specific categories listed, because they were of mixed race. Attempts by the government to create a “mixed race” box for the 2000 Census was met with resistance by racial and ethnic special interest groups like the NAACP and the National Council of La Raza, because they feared that a mixed-race box could pose a danger to the justification for their existence.

The only groups that actively support the continued collection of racial and ethnic data are big government bureaucrats and "racial and ethnic special interest groups” that also happen to receive significant funding from the federal government. These organizations argue that identifying people by race and ethnicity is necessary in order to redress some past injustice and that the federal government must continue to collect and use this information in order to set up special racial and ethnic programs, affirmative action quotas and other set-asides for these groups, many of whom now consist of new immigrants, illegal aliens and non-citizens. Nothing can be further from the truth. In a country where we can no longer ask people what religion they are, what their party affiliation is or what their sexual orientation is, why are we still asking them about their racial and ethnic background?

The fuzzier such racial and ethnic categories become, the harder it will be for these racial and ethnic special interest groups and the government to traffic in them. If a mixed-race category were to be added, every brown-skinned person of mixed race registered in this category would shrink the government’s official count of Blacks, Latinos, Asians or American Indians, eventually reducing their political influence and ultimately the amount of money these groups receive from the federal government, which amounts to approximately $200 billion a year.

With the support of racial and ethnic special interest groups, our federal government seems to view our citizens not just as Americans, but rather as “pawns” in some social science experiment to be classified and separated into different racial or ethnic sub-groups for some unknown purpose. By mandating the classification of Americans into specific racial and ethnic sub-groups, the federal government and the advocates of “diversity” are actually perpetuating institutionalized racism and keeping Americans artificially divided. Maybe that is their real plan.

If we want to help poor Americans escape poverty, get better health care, find a job or get a good education, why should it matter what their race or ethnic background is? The answer is: It should not! Americans need to come together as members of one country and remember that we are all individual Americans, regardless of race or ethnic background. Martin Luther King, Jr., inspired a nation when he voiced his dream for a color-blind nation, a nation in which people would be judged by the content of their characters, "not the color of their skin."

The answer to this government encouraged racism is the concept of Liberty with a limited, constitutional government that is devoted to the protection of individual rights rather than the claims of different racial and ethnic special interest groups. Where Liberty is present, individual achievement and competence are rewarded, not people’s skin color or ethnicity.

The American people need legislation barring the federal government from the collection of racial and ethnic information about them and/or the classification of American citizens by race and ethnicity, including the collection of this data for census information.  Exceptions should be made for law enforcement, hospitals and medical research purposes.

I am proud to be an American and it is none of the government’s business what my race, religion, sexual orientation or ethnic background is.

For Freedom, Liberty and Sovereignty,

 

John Wallace

www.4FLS.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE SWINE FLU SCARE IS COMING BACK

Anyone who read a newspaper, listened to the radio, went on the internet or watched the evening news on TV back in April and May of 2009 might have believed that there was a real possibility that millions of Americans and hundreds of millions of other people throughout the world could be wiped out by the new deadly swine flu virus that was supposed to be sweeping across the globe.

The worldwide media was turning out countless numbers of stories and producing hundreds of TV special reports about the possibility of a swine flu pandemic, complete with on-site videos with people wearing face masks, colorful graphics and interviews with scores of medical experts-for-hire. But was all this news coverage based on a genuine concern for the health and safety of the people, or was it just media hype designed to sell newspapers, TV advertising, anti-flu medicines and vaccines?  

By May 1, 2009, The World Health Organization reported only 331 cases of swine flu worldwide (outside of Mexico), but still declared the crisis to be at level 5 alert on a scale of 6, meaning that they considered this strain of flu an all-out pandemic. On the same date, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirmed that there were 109 cases in the U.S., with several states possibly confirming an additional 22 cases. Did these numbers indicate that a national crisis was at hand? We never did hear the final results of the suspected cases, because most of them turned out to be just the regular flu.

Let’s put these numbers in perspective: According to the Centers for Disease Control, 36,000 Americans die each year (almost 100 a day) from various forms of the flu virus, yet it is not considered a pandemic or a crisis.  Worldwide, Malaria kills 3,000 people every day, but the World Health Organization only considers it "a health problem" and not a pandemic. Of course, there are no fancy vaccines for malaria that can rake in billions of dollars in a very short time period when governments and individuals order millions of doses of vaccines and medications in response to a threat of a new flu pandemic. 

Back in 1976, when the Swine Flu last hit America, the Ford Administration tried to use the fear of a pandemic to force 220 million Americans to accept the idea of mandatory vaccinations.  In a very short period of time, the pharmaceutical industry made $135 million on their vaccines, which had been given to nearly 40 million Americans before the accumulation of fatalities and crippling side effects caused the program to be stopped. When the questionable “pandemic threat” was over, only one person in America had died from the Swine flu, but 25 other Americans had died from the vaccine. By the way, the pharmaceutical companies managed to protect themselves from lawsuits by pre-arranging for the government to assume any liabilities in case there was a problem with the vaccines.  

More recently, in 2006, there was another worldwide pandemic threat called the Avian flu. The same type of videos and stories appeared throughout the media. ABC News even pushed the possibility of a pending worldwide apocalypse to the public by featuring a doctor-for-hire who predicted “that 50% of the population of the world could die” because of the Avian flu. Of course that never happened. Although the death of any person is a tragedy, only 257 people in the entire world died from the Avian flu. That’s 257 people out of 6.5 billion. It could hardly be considered a pandemic or a worldwide health threat. Because of the Avian Flu scare, the Bush Administration purchased and stockpiled millions of doses of anti-flu drugs in case of a future pandemic. Back then, some people thought that the threat of the Avian flu pandemic was cleverly created, manipulated and designed to frighten the American people, in order to line the pockets of politically connected investors and pharmaceutical companies.  

If the profit motive was not part of the reason for the hype and the threat to the American people was real, then why did our government not take the overt actions necessary to protect its own citizens? With almost 2,000 official swine flu cases originating in Mexico, most European and Asian countries, including China, temporary closed their airports to flights from Mexico in order to protect their citizens. Our government took no such steps to protect its citizens against this threat and our borders remained wide open with no restrictions or limitations on Mexicans entering the United States.

The Department of Homeland Security advised that they were on top of the situation and were watching people entering the U.S. for signs of illness. On the surface that sounded like the government was at least doing something, until you read the April 27 Reuters report on what is really happening at the border and that “Mexicans were continuing to (illegally) cross the border by car and foot, seemingly unconcerned by the influenza scare and only a handful are wearing masks.” The failure to secure the border in a time of emergency in order to protect the health and welfare of American citizens was a clear sign that this administration had chosen political correctness over the safety of its own citizens. It’s sad to say, but I don’t believe a Republican administration would have taken the necessary steps either.

By mid-May the whole Swine Flu scare was over and the hype died down. The American borders were still wide open for illegal immigrants and terrorists to enter the country; the pharmaceutical companies made billions; the media companies made hundreds of millions from pharmaceutical company advertising and the administration took credit for a job well done.  Thank God it wasn’t a real emergency!

Numerous doctors and scientists suspect that the swine flu virus was actually cultured in a laboratory. A mainstream Australian virologist, Adrian Gibbs …; who was one of the first to analyze the genetic properties of the 2009 swine flu …; believes that scientists accidentally created the H1N1 virus while producing vaccines. And Dr. John Carlo, Dallas Co. Medical Director, “This strain of swine influenza that’s been cultured in a laboratory is something that’s not been seen anywhere actually in the United States and the world, so this is actually a new strain of influenza that’s been identified.” Because of this, the 2009 swine flu virus …; which has yet to be detected in any animals …; has a rather suspicious pedigree.

Just wait until the 2009-2010 Flu season is upon us. The globalists will be at it again, trying to create another worldwide health crisis. The World Health organization will be issuing bulletins and will probably go to a level 6 Alert. Our elected and appointed government officials here in the U.S. will open command posts and will be operating in a panic mode. The pandemic stories and newscasts will be given worldwide exposure, followed by pharmaceutical ads. Some of our federal and state leaders might even call for mandatory vaccinations as they did in 1976. 

The threat of a worldwide swine flu epidemic will again be blown way out of proportion. Yes, people will get sick, and yes people will die. That's typical for every yearly flu outbreak. What I am concerned about this time is the threats of mandatory vaccinations, which in themselves are a health hazard.   These new vaccines haven't gone through the rigors of normal testing and we will run the risk of a repeat of what happened in the 1976 swine flu outbreak, where there were more deaths from the vaccine than from the flu itself.  

Rather than taking a vaccine to fight a virus that may simply make us ill and we would build up a natural immunity to, it would be better and healthier to let the natural immunity happen.

When the 2009-2010 flu season is finally over, the results will be the same. More people will die from the regular flu and the swine flu vaccines, then will die from the actual swine flu. The media and the pharmaceutical companies will make billions of dollars and the World Health Organization and various governments around the world will take credit for a job well done. Thank God it will not be a real emergency!

By John Wallace
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BARACK OBAMA'S SECRET PAST REVEALED ON VIDEO

To My fellow Freedom Loving Americans,

Many of us were waiting for a 6-part special video series on the Fox Network's Sean Hannity Show on Auguest 9th, 2009 that would show the radical past, radical associates, the extensive coverups and history of Barack Obama.Why were the videos mysteriously removed from the show with no mention of why they were removed?

The Fox Network must have had good reason to walk away after the obvious expenses of production and all the hype that preceded it.Yes, the program was not aired on August 9th, but the segments somehow found their way to YouTube.

I wonder who was responsible for taking the story off the air ?

What was the real reason the show was blocked?

Is this how the Politburo in our federal Government is 'protecting' us from the truth?

Here are the 6 segments if they haven't been removed before you get to them. Watch it quickly, I expect Obama will order YouTube to take it from their servers as soon as he knows it's out there.I don't know how to download it to a hard drive. If anyone does, please share with the rest of us so we can preserve the evidence.

Here are the 6 segments. Please watch them before the Politburo in our federal government takes them off the internet.

Part 1 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rthv8QmJLUw

Part 2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJNhKZh8mGY&feature=fvw

Part 3 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95XFUi8PrTs&feature=related

Part 4 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gl4twMf1xyM&feature=related

Part 5 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKzFtKEysjw&feature=related

Part 6 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmEmRbRJFLU&feature=

For Freedom, Liberty and Sovereignty,

John Wallace
http://www.4fls.com/
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

PRIVATE INSURANCE TO BE ILLEGAL UNDER OBAMA HEALTH PLAN

Hasn't President Obama repeatedly promised that under his proposed health care program, all Americans would still have the right to choose or stay in their private insurance plans if they wanted to?

Didn't the Democratic leadership in congress tell us that their proposed health plan was supposed to be the ideal legislation for the "Health Care for All Americans" and that it would still give us a choice?

Well guess what?  President Obama and the Democrats have lied to us again.

Take a look at Page 16 of the 1,018 page proposed health plan for America and you will see that there is a provision in this proposed legislation that will eventually make individual private medical insurance illegal. That is correct. The private health insurance that many Americans enjoy today, will be illegal for their children and grandchildren under the proposed Obama plan.

When I first read the paragraph on July 15th, I thought that I surely must be mistaken.  Maybe I was misreading the words. Can it be that once again, President Obama and the radical Democrats currently in control of the congress, have promised us one thing and are giving us the exact opposite again?

The answer is YES!

As you can see for yourself, the provision on page 16 clearly shows that their plan is to definitely make private individual health insurance illegal. Here's how they intend to do it.

Under the new federal government's Politburo's NewSpeak header of "Protecting The Choice To Keep Current Coverage," the "Limitation On New Enrollment" section of the bill clearly states:

"Except as provided in this paragraph, the individual health insurance issuer offering such coverage does not enroll any individual in such coverage if the first effective date of coverage is on or after the first day" of the year the legislation becomes law. This means that no new policies can be written by private insurers after the date the legislation becomes effective.

So my fellow Americans, we will still be able to keep our current coverage, just as our socialist government leaders have promised, but here is how most Americans will eventually lose their private health insurance:

1. Those who currently have private individual coverage won't be able to change it, and

2. Those who leave a company to work for themselves will no longer be able to buy individual plans from private health insurance carriers.

For years, opponents of the 'public option plan' have warned that if the government gets into the business of offering subsidized health insurance coverage, the private insurance market will wither away and die because they can't compete with mandatory government subsidized plans.

Employers, who now provide health insurance to their employees, including big corporations like Wal-Mart, will gladly give up their private plans because the public option plan will be 30% to 40% cheaper for them, courtesy of you and me, the American taxpayer.

In April of 2009, the nonpartisan Lewin Group estimated that 120 million or more Americans could lose their current employer provided group coverage at work and will have no choice but to end up in the government run socialized health program. That would leave private health insurance companies with less than 50 million potential health insurance customers, which would not be large enough to sustain the private health insurance market. This bill, if signed into law, will kill the market for private individual coverage because it does not allow any new policies to be written after the public option becomes law. Eventually, as more and more Americans are forced into the public option against their will, the private health insurance market will just whither away and die.

The legislation is also designed to finish off private health savings accounts, a goal that the Democrats in congress have had for years. They want to destroy this  alternative because no other program gives individual Americans more control over their medical care, and gives the government less control, than these types of accounts. With Health Saving Accounts effectively made illegal under the proposed legislation, one of the key obstacles to the American socialists' expansion of the American welfare state will be overcome.

The dangers of the proposed 'public option' is that it will not be a real option for many Americans, but rather a government mandate for buying government designed care. Freedom loving Americans should be outraged at this advance of government imposed tyranny at the hands of our elected officials.

There is no constitutional authority for the federal government to outlaw private markets in which American citizens voluntarily participate. The Politburo in our curent federal government should not be proposing and passing legislation designed to destroy private business opportunities in America. It should be proposing and passing legislation that is designed to create private business opportunities. 

It has taken a review of just a few pages of this proposed legislation to determine that this is a clear attempt to grow not only the size of our government, but to increase the government's control over our everyday lives. Imagine how many more attacks on our freedoms and liberties will be found in the entire document.

Remember that we cannot fully enjoy our freedoms and liberties in America unless our government is limited. As our government grows and becomes more intrusive, it is our freedoms and liberties that are becoming limited!  The Obama Health Plan is definitely another attack on our freedoms and liberties.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Cap and Trade: A Disaster for America

 

On June 26th, the House of Representatives passed the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 by a vote of 219 to 212. The bill, also know as “Cap and Trade” legislation, should more appropriately be called “Cap and Tax” legislation because the federal government is trying to “CAP” Americans’ Freedoms and then “TAX” the necessities of living like gas, food and even heating oil.

This bill, like so many other pieces of major federal legislation in recent years, was rammed through congress by the Democratic leadership without even giving the members the time to read it, let alone understand it, all in violation of their now worthless promise to create a more transparent legislative process. The Democrats added 300 pages of amendments to the legislation at 3:00AM on the day of the vote, giving the members of congress less than 12 hours to read the whole 1,200 page bill. Rep. Joe Barton asked repeatedly during the debate on Friday afternoon if there was even a copy of the bill anywhere in the House chamber and Democratic Rep. Ellen Tauscher, who was sitting in the speaker’s chair, repeatedly avoided the question. No full copy of the legislation was ever produced. What was the rush and why were the American people and their elected representatives denied the ability to read the bill before it was voted on? How does this help the American people?

Even the proponents of this massive tax bill acknowledge that it would only have a minimum impact on future concentrations of greenhouse gases and would only reduce the earth's future temperature by 0.1 to 0.2 degrees C by 2100, an amount too small to even notice. The truth is that there is no Global Warming crisis. That is why the proponents of global warming had to change the name to “climate change” because the earth is actually in a cooling cycle. All of the hype and threats of a looming climate crisis have been carefully manufactured and generated solely for the purpose of getting this massive bill through Congress, with a minimum of debate, before the American people realize that they have again been conned, lied to and of course, required to pay even more repressive taxes. How does this help the American people?

The current Democratic majority in Congress, aided by some cowardly Republicans, seem to be constantly working against the freedom, liberties and desires of the American people. They love the “cap and trade” concept because there is a fraudulent public perception that they are taxing evil corporate “polluters” and protecting the American people from global warming and pollution. This is simply not the truth. History shows us that once the government is allowed to create a scarce new commodity like the “rights to emit certain levels of carbon” and then creates the government control mechanism that mandates that all businesses that emit carbon must buy or otherwise obtain these “rights” from the government, the cost for these “rights” is inevitably passed on to all consumers in the form of higher prices at the wholesale and retail level. How does this help the American people?

Peter Orszag, former Director of the Congressional Budget Office and now Mr. Obama’s Budget Director, testified before Congress back in 2008 that “price increases are essential to the success of a cap-and-trade program.” The American Petroleum Institute claims this legislation would mean $4.00 or more for gas at the pump and will cost Americans billions of dollars in higher costs, kill jobs and will not deliver any of the environmental benefits promised. The Black Chamber of Commerce estimates the bill will result in a net loss of over 2 million jobs a year, that is in excess of any new "green" jobs that might be created. How does this help the American people?

Wouldn’t it be simpler just to impose stiff fines on the companies that pollute? Putting a price on these “rights” to carbon emissions is regressive because the burden to pay for these rights will ultimately fall disproportionately on the nation’s poor and middle-income households who spend a larger percentage of their paychecks on things like gas to drive to work, groceries or home heating. It also allows big polluters with a lot of money to keep polluting as long as they buy or somehow obtain these new “rights.” How does this help the American people?

The House version of the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 is a very clever scheme devised to redistribute income and wealth. Unlike Robin Hood, who took money from the rich to give to the poor, the federal government will be acting more like the evil Sheriff of Nottingham, because this legislation is designed to take money from the working class and the poor, in the form of high prices and give it to the Wall Street “green tech” investors, private bankers and “green energy” special interest groups who will be involved in the creation of a carbon emission “rights” trading system. How does this help the American people?

Not only will the cost of this Cap and Trade legislation drive up the price of everything that is manufactured in the United States, it will also make American made products more expensive and a great deal less competitive on the world markets. If enacted into law, it will begin the process of a massive transfer of manufacturing jobs and wealth from the United States to second and third world foreign countries that have no such restrictions on their manufacturing and energy producing companies. How does this help the American people?

This is not just a new massive tax increase on hard working American citizens, but rather it is a premeditated and calculated move to further take control of the American economy by the Politburo in the current federal government. This current “cap and trade” bill is bad legislation. It has been written by corrupt politicians and special interest groups for the benefit of those groups.  If enacted as written, this bill will be as disaster for Americans in terms of the economy and their individual freedoms and liberties.

Americans must remember that we cannot fully enjoy our freedoms and liberties in America unless our government is limited. For as our government grows and becomes more intrusive, as it is today, it is our freedoms and liberties that are becoming limited! 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Democrats Refuse to Cut Census Funds to ACORN

Iowa Republican Rep. Steve King introduced an amendment that would bar the Census Bureau from disbursing taxpayer funds to the activist group ACORN — but Democrats immediately squelched the measure, King disclosed.

In a release issued on Tuesday, after the amendment regarding the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now was introduced, King said: "It is time for every member of this Congress to go on record in support of or opposition to ACORN. ACORN and its estimated 270 corporate affiliates comprise a complex organizational and financial spider web with all the appearance of a criminal enterprise. ACORN is facing charges of voter fraud and tax violations, yet it has received over $53 million in taxpayer funds.

"Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank and his liberal friends have opened the taxpayers’ wallet to as much as an additional $8.5 billion that could be accessed by ACORN.
"ACORN could soon be running the 2010 census if President Obama, a former ACORN employee, follows through on plans to have ACORN ‘partner’ with the Census Bureau. It is time to cut off ACORN’s access to taxpayer dollars and put an end to ACORN’s involvement in the 2010 census."

On Wednesday, King's office issued another release that read in part: "Last night, Speaker [Nancy] Pelosi and Democrat leaders passed a gag rule to ensure" that King’s amendment "never made it to the House floor."

King stated, "This Pelosi Congress is violating its commitments to the American people so it can protect its political cronies like ACORN . . .

"Democrats refuse to allow a debate, let alone cut off ACORN’s access to the taxpayers’ wallet . . .
"Justice demands that Congress cut off ACORN’s access to taxpayer dollars and put an immediate end to ACORN’s involvement in the 2010 census."

Rep. King told Newsmax in early June that he believes ACORN "has completely the face of a criminal enterprise, and it should be thoroughly investigated by Congress and the Department of Justice."
Tags: fraud   ACORN  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Speech: A Gathering for Freedom and Liberty

Text of Speech by John Wallace - delivered at the Albany Tea Party's "March on Albany" Rally, in Albany, New York on June 16, 2009.

I want to thank the members of the Albany Tea Party for giving me the opportunity to say a few words at this great gathering for Freedom and Liberty. Our country's Founders told us that Governments get their just powers from the consent of the governed and whenever the government becomes destructive of these ends, it is not only the people's Right, but it is their Sacred Duty to change the government, and that includes the dysfunctional New York State Government.

My fellow citizens, although some foreign countries and terrorists groups do indeed pose serious threats to our country and our state, in 2009 the greatest threats to our freedoms and liberties are not coming from them, but rather, they are coming from within our own country; from our federal government and from our New York State government, because they no longer represent us. That is why we have come here today from all parts of the state, from all walks of life and from all political parties and views: TO RECLAIM OUR FREEDOMS AND LIBERTIES.

The America people, including those of us who live here in New York State, are losing our freedoms and liberties because of corrupt politicians, political correctness, a lack of basic common sense by our leaders, as well as the negative influence of special interest groups who are pushing their questionable agendas upon New Yorkers and the rest of the American people from a hundred different directions at once.

In 1863, Abraham Lincoln, described our nation as "a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. I'm afraid that is no longer true. In 2009, we now have federal government and a New York State government of the special interest groups, by the special interests groups, and for the special interest groups.

To those New York State and federal elected officials who may be listening out there today, "We The People" have some demands to present to you today:

We demand FREEDOM FROM CORRUPT ELECTED OFFICIALS who accept millions of dollars in bribes from Special Interest groups every year.

We demand FREEDOM FROM THE INVASION OF ILLEGAL ALIENS that costs the American taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars every year. We demand that New York State cut off the honey pot of welfare and free medical care that attracts illegal aliens to our State and is bankrupting us; that you mandate employers use an E-verify system in NY and we also demand that you never issue illegal aliens' drivers' licenses.

We demand FREEDOM FROM ELECTION FRAUD. We demand an honest and verifiable election process that produces a permanent, verifiable paper record of the peoples' votes. We demand that the New York State Legislature repeal its motor-voter laws that enable non-citizens and illegal aliens to vote in our elections.

We demand FREEDOM FROM A MULTI-LINGUAL SOCIETY by passing legislation designating English as the official language of the United States and New York State with all official government documents, including ballots, printed in English only; for it is our common language that unifies us and will preserve us as one nation.

We demand FREEDOM FROM THE COLLECTION OF RACIAL AND ETHNIC DATA ABOUT US THAT IS USED TO SEPARATE US INTO GROUPS, (by NYS and the federal government) much the same as Hitler did in Nazi Germany in the 1930's. We no longer ask people about their religion; why do we still ask about their race and ethnic background? We the People should not longer be classified as white-New Yorkers or black-New Yorkers: for We are just New Yorkers; We should no longer be classified as black-Americans or Hispanic Americans; for We are just Americans!

We demand FREEDOM FROM THE ATTACKS ON FAMILY FARMERS and private organic food growers through heavy handed overregulation of our water and food supplies for the benefit of big corporations who for some reason remain exempt. We do not need a National or a New York State Animal Identification System and the use of GROWTH HORMONES and GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS should be BANNED IN NEW YORK and the rest of the country because they are Dangerous to our health.

We demand FREEDOM FROM DESTRUCTIVE INTERNATIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS like NAFTA AND CAFTA that have resulted in the loss of many thousands of jobs in New York State and millions of jobs across the country. These agreements have destroyed the once strong manufacturing base in New York, and the rest of America as well.

We demand FREEDOM FROM THE ENDLESS CYCLE OF WAR. Only Congress has the Power...To declare War," but no Congress has declared war since December 8th, 1941, the day after the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor. The U.S. Congress did not declare war on North Korea, Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Grenada, Lebanon, Somalia, Haiti, Panama, Serbia or Bosnia. Since World War II, over 115,000 U.S. military personnel have died and many hundreds of thousands more wounded in undeclared wars and so-called peacekeeping missions to enforce mandates of the United Nations.

We demand FREEDOM FROM THE UNITED NATIONS AND FROM THOSE WHO ARE PUSHING FOR A NEW WORLD ORDER, who seek to destroy our national sovereignty through international treaties and agreements. We not only demand that America get out of the UN; we also demand that the UN get out of New York and America.

We demand FREEDOM FROM UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND EXCESSIVE TAXATION at all levels of government. Its time to repeal the unconstitutional Income tax as well as the outrageous School Taxes in New York.

We demand FREEDOM FROM OUT OF CONTROL GOVERNMENT SPENDING. Its time that our New York State and federal governments do what the rest of us have to do: Don't spend more than you take in.

We demand FREEDOM FROM THE INCESANT ATTACKS ON OUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS including recent attacks right here in Albany County. Thomas Jefferson told us that the main reason for the people to keep and bear arms was not to defend themselves against some foreign power, but to protect themselves against tyranny by their own government. Law abiding American citizens have a right to keep and bear arms. It is a fundamental, individual Constitutional right that we will defend with our lives. YOU WILL NOT TAKE OUR GUNS!

We demand FREEDOM FROM ATTACKS ON OUR INDIVIDUAL PRIVACY AND FROM A REAL ID CARD. We do not want the New York State government, in the name of security, to imbed radio frequency ID chips in our driver's licenses to tag and track us like animals.

We demand FREEDOM FROM THE DRUGGING OF 6 MILLION OF OUR CHILDREN EVERY DAY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY. 10% of all 6-18 year old boys in the United States are currently on psychotropic drugs like Ritalin for attention deficit disorders, despite the fact that there is no independent, scientifically accepted valid test for these disorders.

We demand FREEDOM FROM AN EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM that de-emphasizes academic knowledge and has dumbed-down our children to a point where many of them can't find America on a world map, but they know how to put a condom on a cucumber. The present system in New York State, and the rest of the country, is designed for INDOCTRINATION, not EDUCATION.

Here in New York, the parents need School Vouchers, School Choice and Homeschool support to ensure that our children have a better chance to learn and become more productive members of society. We give the unconstitutional Federal Department of Education a failing grade of "F" and demand that it be abolished. And to the NYS Department of Education: We are putting you on probation.

We demand FREEDOM FROM THE PRIVATE CONTROL OF OUR NATION'S MONEY SUPPLY. In Our Constitution, the people of the United States granted Congress the power to coin Money and regulate its Value. We never gave a private group of international bankers on the Federal Reserve Board the constitutional power to print Trillions of dollars of worthless, fiat money, backed by absolutely nothing that is destroying our economy, putting our country and New York State into bankruptcy and making debtors of our grandchildren and great grandchildren before they are even born.

Thomas Jefferson warned us that a private central bank (like our Federal Reserve) which issues the public currency is "a greater menace to the liberties of the people than a standing army." We agree. The Federal Reserve should not just be audited, it must also be abolished.

THE GOOD NEWS IS THAT THERE ARE STILL NO LIMITS TO WHAT WE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE CAN DO, ONCE WE DECIDE TO ACT:

In 1776, our Founders stood up, put their lives and fortunes on the line and declared their freedom and independence from the chains and shackles of the King of England. In 2009, Americans must once again be willing to stand up and publicly declare their Freedom and Independence, not from the King of England, but from the chains and shackles of our own government and from those traitorous individuals and organizations who pull the strings of the politicians and the media like puppet masters from behind a curtain of secrecy, bribery and deception.

The fight for our freedoms and liberties must begin here and now. We must put aside those minor differences that have separated us in the past and unite as one strong political force to restore our Freedoms and Liberties now. We must recruit more freedom loving Americans into our ranks and grow our numbers by the millions.

The road ahead will not be easy and the traitorous enemies within our own country are very cunning, unscrupulous and have unlimited resources. But they are no match for an army of united and determined citizens like us who are prepared to fight the hard battles that lie ahead, as our Founders did 233 years ago, and WE WILL PREVAIL!

Let the word go forth that the year 2009 will mark the beginning of a journey that will leave future generations of Americans a legacy of individual freedom and liberty, a first class education system, a clean environment, a strong and sovereign America with an honest, limited government that will offer unlimited opportunities for their future. For there is no doubt: WE WILL PREVAIL!

Thank you all for coming here today and may God Bless a Free and Sovereign America!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE TEA PARTIES OF 2009 ARE THE BEGINNING OF THE SECOND AMERICAN REVOLUTION

The words "No Taxation without Representation" began as a slogan in the period 1763-1776 just before the first American Revolution. The slogan summarized the primary grievance of the American colonists in the Thirteen Colonies who believed the lack of representation in the British Parliament was an illegal denial of their rights as English citizens. The colonists believed that the laws excessively taxing them for services they did not receive were illegal.

On the evening of December 16, 1773, three companies of fifty men each, masquerading as Mohawk Indians, passed through a tremendous crowd of spectators, went aboard the three ships, broke open the tea chests, and heaved them into the harbor. As the electrifying news of the Boston "tea party" spread, other seaports followed the example and staged similar acts of resistance of their own. Eventually the movement for freedom and liberty expanded with the colonists declaring their independence from England in 1776.

It has become apparent to most Americans that our elected representatives in Congress, just like the British Parliament of the 1760's and 1770's, are no longer representing the interests of the American people. Our congress routinely passes legislation that benefits a wide variety of special interest groups at the expense of the average American citizen and taxpayer. Through the use of special interest bribes, also called campaign contributions, America now has the best congress that money can buy. Our government is now as corrupt as any banana republic or communist government in history.

American taxpayers are seeing their taxes go up at every level of government, oftentimes for services and programs that they do not benefit from, nor approve of. Our local government and school taxes are rising at a rate far exceeding any increases in our incomes. The U.S. congress and the Federal Reserve are printing fiat money (backed by nothing) as fast as the printing presses can print it and the American taxpayers are starting to get angry about the increasing burden of taxation placed upon them and they have every right to be angry.

The American taxpayers who live up to their responsibilities and who work hard (often holding two jobs) to pay their bills with less take-home money are:

1.                  paying for ongoing failed social engineering experiments in housing and education,

2.                  paying for the funding of anti-American, socialist organizations like LaRaza and   ACORN,

3.                  paying for a variety of services provided to 15 million +/- illegal aliens,

4.                  paying for the bailout of large international banks, Wall Street Firms and the auto industry

5.                  paying for the bailout of real estate investors and people who are unable or unwilling to be responsible adults and who fail to pay their own bills, including their mortgages.

Many American citizens, particularly those who pay taxes, are frustrated by a government that no longer represents them, but rather represents the interests of an oligarchy of political and financial elites, as well as special interest groups, who exert unconstitutional and illegal control over our government and economy for their personal gain.

The members of this ruling elite are not loyal Americans who have the best interests of the county in mind, but rather they are traitorous individuals who are loyal to no country but who benefit financially or politically by keeping our country in a constant state of war, by dumbing down our education system, by devaluating our currency, by separating us into categories by race and ethnic origin, by drugging 6 million of children with mind altering drugs, by flooding our country with illegal aliens, by and by chipping away at our nation's sovereignty, freedoms and liberties.

I believe that Americans are fast approaching a point of frustration and anger with their own government similar to what the American colonists reached in the 1770’s. Americans want to take their country and government back from the corrupt political and financial elites who control it. The massive attendance by average American citizens at the Tea Party Rallies across the country in April of 2009 was a sign that the people have had enough. Just like the original Boston Tea Party and those that followed, the Tea Parties of 2009 will someday be seen as the beginning of the Second American Revolution. Although the Tea Parties of 2009 were an important first step, there is much more work to be done.

Americans must now put aside all of our minor differences that have separated us in the past and unite as one strong political force. We must become united by our major common goals and not divided by our minor differences. We must become active in politics and support only those candidates that are honest, ethical, of good moral character, who take no special interest money and who support smaller, less intrusive federal, state and local governments.

Together, freedom loving American citizens must begin the journey that will leave future generations of Americans a legacy of individual freedom and liberty, a first class education system, a clean environment, a strong and sovereign America with an honest, limited government that will offer unlimited opportunities for their future. If we stand together and are willing to fight for our freedoms and liberties as the original American colonists did, we can give it to them.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The 2009 Swine Flu: The Hype and the Response

   

Anyone who has read a newspaper, listened to the radio, gone on the internet or watched the evening news on TV over the last week or so, might believe that there is a real possibility that millions of Americans and hundreds of millions of other people throughout the world could be wiped out by a new deadly swine flu virus that is sweeping across the globe. The worldwide media has been turning out countless numbers of stories and producing hundreds of TV special reports about the possibility of a swine flu pandemic, complete with on-site videos with people wearing face masks, colorful graphics and interviews with scores of medical experts-for-hire. But is all this news coverage based on a genuine concern for the health and safety of the people, or is it just media hype designed to sell newspapers, TV advertising, anti-flu medicines and vaccines?  

On May 1, 2009, The World Health Organization reported only 331 cases of swine flu worldwide (outside of Mexico), but still declared the crisis to be at level 5 alert on a scale of 6, meaning that this strain of flu might be considered an all-out pandemic if the numbers keep rising. On the same date, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirmed that there were 109 cases in the U.S., with several states possibly confirming an additional 22 cases. Do these numbers indicate that a national crisis is at hand?

Let’s put these numbers in perspective: According to the Centers for Disease Control, 36,000 Americans die each year (almost 100 a day) from various forms of the flu virus, yet it is not considered a pandemic or a crisis.  Worldwide, Malaria kills 3,000 people every day, but the World Health Organization only considers it "a health problem" and not a pandemic. Of course, there are no fancy vaccines for malaria that can rake in billions of dollars in a very short time period when governments and individuals order millions of doses of vaccines and medications in response to a threat of a new flu pandemic. 

Back in 1976, when the Swine Flu last hit America, the Ford Administration tried to use the fear of a pandemic to force 220 million Americans to accept the idea of mandatory vaccinations.  In a very short period of time, the pharmaceutical industry made $135 million on their vaccines, which had been given to nearly 40 million Americans before the accumulation of fatalities and crippling side effects caused the program to be stopped. When the questionable “pandemic threat” was over, only one person in America had died from the Swine flu, but 25 other Americans had died from the vaccine. By the way, the pharmaceutical companies managed to protect themselves from lawsuits by pre-arranging for the government to assume any liabilities in case there was a problem with the vaccines.  

More recently, in 2006, there was another worldwide pandemic threat called the Avian flu. The same type of videos and stories appeared throughout the media. ABC News even pushed the possibility of a pending worldwide apocalypse to the public by featuring a doctor-for-hire who predicted “that 50% of the population of the world could die” because of the Avian flu. Of course that never happened. Although the death of any person is a tragedy, only 257 people in the entire world died from the Avian flu. That’s 257 people out of 6.5 billion. It could hardly be considered a pandemic or a worldwide health threat. Because of the Avian Flu scare, the Bush Administration purchased and stockpiled millions of doses of anti-flu drugs in case of a future pandemic. Back then, some people thought that the threat of the Avian flu pandemic was cleverly created, manipulated and designed to frighten the American people, in order to line the pockets of politically connected investors and pharmaceutical companies.  

If the profit motive is not part of the reason for the current hype and the threat to the American people is real, then why has our government not taken the overt actions necessary to protect its own citizens? With almost 2,000 official swine flu cases originating in Mexico, most European and Asian countries, including China, have closed their airports to flights from Mexico in order to protect their citizens. Our government has taken no such steps to protect its citizens against this threat and our borders remain wide open with no restrictions or limitations on Mexicans entering the United States.

The Department of Homeland Security advised that they are on top of the situation and are watching people entering the U.S. for signs of illness. On the surface it sounds like the government is at least doing something, until you read the April 27 Reuters report on what is really happening at the border and that “Mexicans are continuing to (illegally) cross the border by car and foot, seemingly unconcerned by the influenza scare and only a handful are wearing masks.” The failure to secure the border in a time of emergency in order to protect the health and welfare of American citizens is a sign that this administration has chosen political correctness over the safety of its own citizens. It’s sad to say, but I don’t believe a Republican administration would take the necessary steps either.

I am sure that by mid-May the whole Swine Flu scare will be over and the hype will have died down. The American borders will remain wide open for illegal immigrants and terrorists to enter the country; the pharmaceutical companies will have made billions; the media companies will have made hundreds of millions from pharmaceutical company advertising and the administration will take credit for a job well done.  

Thank God it wasn’t a real emergency!

Tags: Swine flu  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is American on the Road to Fascism?

 

Mr. G. Richard Wagoner, the chairman and chief executive officer of General Motors, was recently forced to resign his position because of pressure from the Obama administration. He was told that if he didn’t leave, the Obama administration would not give General Motors any more federal bailout money. President Obama also told General Motors and the Chrysler  Corporation that if they wanted more federal bailout money, they would have to shrink and refocus their businesses according to his (the federal government’s) wishes.

In our country’s history, there have been some limited instances of the federal government exercising some sort of control over private industry, but that was during wartime. The current assault on American capitalism by the Obama administration is unprecedented in both its scope and speed and should raise the red flag of alarm for all freedom-loving Americans.

World history has shown us that the implementation of strict government controls over private industries has been one of the first steps in the introduction of various forms of Fascism to formerly free countries.  The practice of a government taking control of private industries was refined by Benito Mussolini in Italy in the 1920’s and it is called ‘corporatism.’  
According to Wikipedia, political scientists use the term ‘corporatism’ to describe “a practice whereby a state, through the process of licensing and regulating officially-incorporated social, religious, economic, or popular organizations, effectively co-opts their leadership or circumscribes their ability to challenge state authority by establishing the state as the source of their legitimacy, as well as sometimes running them, either directly or indirectly.”  Mussolini described it more simply when he said, "Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power."

Some corporatist-style regimes of the 20th century included those of Benito Mussolini of Italy (1922-1945), Adolph Hitler of Germany (1933 to 1945); Francisco Franco of Spain (1936 to 1973); Juan Peron of Argentina (1943 to 1955) and even our own President Franklin Roosevelt (1933 to 1945) during the ‘New Deal.’ The Mussolini, Hitler, Franco and Peron regimes were brutal, totalitarian, Fascist dictatorships, but not all the regimes that had a corporatist foundation were fascist. The Roosevelt administration, despite its many faults, could not be described as fascist, but the ‘New Deal’ program was definitely corporatist.

Corporatism boils down to this: The government tells industry (and eventually labor unions) what to do and that they must do it for the supposed good of the country, or else their individual leaders will pay a price. Does this sound similar to what is happening to the auto industry today?

Where in the U.S. Constitution does it authorize the President of the United States to fire the head of a major private corporation just because he disagrees with his management policies? Where in the U.S. Constitution does it authorize the President of the United States to decide what kind of cars a private company will build? or what kind of car I will drive?  President Barack ‘Mussolini’ Obama is taking this country down a very dangerous road and a road that America has never taken before.

Confucius said “A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.” Are the ‘corporatist’ policies of President Obama and his administration just the first steps of many in a move towards a government takeover of our major industries? Are these policies much different than those that Mussolini and Hitler initiated in the early stages of their rise to power?  

With the Politburo in our expanding federal government now having the power to hire and fire the leaders of major private corporations and to tell the auto makers what cars they can produce, will they soon be telling Americans what kind of cars they can drive; how much money they can earn;  where they can go to school, what sodas they can drink, what foods they can’t eat, where they can travel, what national ID card they must carry at all times and it will impose any number of other restrictions on them. Look at California, where the state legislature is currently considering banning black cars by 2012, for some bogus global warming reason.  

Thomas Jefferson said: “A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take away everything you have.” Americans must remember that we cannot fully enjoy our freedoms and liberties in America unless we keep our government limited. As our government grows and becomes more intrusive, as it is today, it is our freedoms and liberties that are becoming limited.

Welcome to the United Socialist States of America! If we continue on President Obama’s road to "CHANGE" (socialism), the American people will no longer be free. The question is: “Will we learn to accept our captivity at the hands of our new masters or will we be willing to do something about it?”
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12345Next »