About Me

Name: John Wallace
Email: john@grayrider.org Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Comments on Gov Paterson's Proposed New Taxes to Balance the Budget

Governor Paterson’s proposal to balance next year’s budget by adding a whole new group of taxes and fees on individuals, families and small businesses, is outrageous. At the same time, he is also proposing cutting TAP tuition grants for middle class college students and eliminating STAR real estate tax rebates for homeowners.If these proposed increases in taxes and fees are passed, New York’s taxpayers and homeowners will have to cut back on their spending because the new taxes will mean anywhere from $1,500 to $4,000 less money in their pockets.

To make matters worse, while the Governor plans on taking this money out of the pockets of hard working taxpaying New Yorkers, he has proposed giving a raise to welfare recipients so they will have more money in their pockets to spend.

How do these new taxes and fees make economic sense? The average New York State homeowner and taxpayer is paying more and more in taxes and fees every year. In some cases, real estate taxes (even with the STAR program) have been rising at a rate of between 10% and 15% a year, or more. Now the Governor intends to keep expanding state government and spending more money by raising taxes on almost everything, including non-diet soda. The governor’s proposal to eliminate the middle-class STAR rebate without also enacting a tax cap will increase the burden already borne by overtaxed New York homeowners.

I realize that New York State is in financial trouble and that Gov. Paterson is looking for new revenue sources, but looking at selective sources to raise revenues, including a tax on non-diet soft drinks, is not the answer. The Governor is using the possible health connection between non-diet soda and obesity, but I believe he’s just looking for additional revenues in any way he can get it. If that is the case, then why stop at non-diet soda? Why not tax cookies or Big Mac’s? Maybe people should have an annual weigh-in at the DMV office and be taxed if they are over a certain weight. How about taxing people who exercise a lot because they use more oxygen than the rest of us? How about taxing the Governor, State Senators and members of the Assembly when they fail to pass a balanced budget on time?

Less get realistic. In the tough economic times we face, it would make more sense to cut spending, improve accountability measures to ensure our tax dollars are spent wisely. Our elected officials at the federal, state and local levels must be made to understand that the taxpayers’ money is not unlimited. Giving welfare recipients a raise, while taxing the heck out of the rest of us is also not the answer.

I think it’s time for Governor Patterson and State lawmakers to start doing what the rest of us have to do. Live within your means and don’t spend more than you take in.

By John W. Wallace
Chatham, NY
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

AMERICA'S TREASONOUS LILLIPUTIANS

In 1726, Jonathan Swift wrote “Gulliver’s Travels” which was a story of an English surgeon, named Lemuel Gulliver, who takes to the high seas when his business in England fails. Gulliver's multiple adventures begin in a place called Lilliput when he awakens on a beach after a shipwreck only to find himself immobilized and tied down by thousands of tiny threads woven around him by the very tiny Lilliputians. If Gulliver had been awake, he could easily have snapped these threads individually or in small numbers and the Lilliputians would never have succeeded in taking control of Gulliver and making him their prisoner. Those tiny threads were multiplied and woven hundreds and thousands of times by the Lilliputians while Gulliver was sleeping. By the time Gulliver finally did wake up, it was too late. He was totally incapacitated and unable to do anything. He was at the mercy of his new masters, the Lilliputians.

Just like Gulliver, the American people appear to be either asleep or unaware of the growing danger of being incapacitated by America’s own version of the Lilliputians, who are nothing more than well financed traitors to this great country. Do not underestimate the danger. There is a network of prominent individuals and organizations, led by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), who are very much like the Lilliputians in Gulliver’s Travels. Pushing the globalist agenda of their masters, these individuals and organizations are extremely well financed by large international banking and corporate foundations and they currently pose more of a danger to America’s freedoms, liberties and sovereignty than any foreign enemy.

After World War II, this same network of individuals and organizations were instrumental in the founding of the United Nations, which was specifically designed to be used as an instrument in the creation of the New World Order. The American delegation to the San Francisco meeting that drafted the charter of the United Nations in 1949 included many CFR members such as Nelson Rockefeller, John Foster Dulles, John Mc Cloy and the Secretary-General of the conference, Alger Hiss, who was later arrested as a communist spy for Russia, as were several other prominent CFR members.

This growing network of individuals and non-governmental organizations (NGO’s) have been instrumental in using our country’s membership in the United Nations and other international organizations to circumvent the US Constitution by gradually expanding the role and power of these international organizations in an effort to diminish our own sovereignty. They advocate giving a wide variety of international organizations ever increasing powers at the expense of the sovereignty of individual nations. They also advocate for the consolidation of international finances and money creating powers into the hands of a few private international banks. All of this is proposed for the benefit of all mankind, of course, and they always push for global organizations to solve global issues.

The individual “threads of change” that America’s own traitorous Lilliputians use against their fellow Americans are varied and if examined individually would not appear to pose to any big danger to our way of life in America. But added together, these individual “threads of change” are placing American’s freedoms, liberties and sovereignty at risk. This is one reason that many Americans today feel that the American way of life is being attacked and challenged every single day from a hundred different directions and they are right.

Here are a few of the “threads of change” currently being woven around America’s freedoms, liberties and sovereignty by these traitorous enemies within out own country:

a. Millions of dollars in “legal” special interest bribes to our politicians every year;
b. 12-20 million illegal aliens allowed to remain in the country costing the American taxpayers billions of dollars;
c. Election fraud through the use of new electronic voting machines without paper trails;
d. Downplaying of the importance of English as our official language;
e. Destroying our manufacturing jobs through unfair trade agreements like NAFTA that benefit corporations over American workers;
f. Growing influence of private, non-governmental organizations (NGO’s) like the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission on our government’s political leaders and policies;
g. Failed social engineering programs in housing, education, finance, employment, etc.
h. Expansion of underfunded entitlement programs;
i. Ever increasing taxation of the people at every level of government;
j. Frequent attacks on the Second Amendment rights of American citizens from every level of government;
k. Creation of one financial crises after another that are designed to allow the federal government and the Federal Reserve to assume a larger role in controlling the economy even though the federal government’s own actions, policies and legislation caused the crises in the first place;
l. Federal government’s use of the threat of terrorism as an excuse to become more intrusive into our everyday lives and thereby place more and more limitations on our personal freedoms and liberties;
m. Increasing use of prescription drugs to alter the behavior of more and more Americans. For example: At the present time, there are 6 million children under the age of 18 in the USA who have been prescribed mind-altering psychotropic drugs like Ritalin;
n. Deliberate “dumbing down” of the American education system through revised teaching methods and the re-writing of textbooks to include politically correct and globalist agendas;
o. Deliberate and frequent attacks on mainstream organized religions (particularly Jewish and Christian);
p. Surrender of our government’s constitutional power to create money to a group of private international bankers (the Federal Reserve) who answer to no one and who are slowly and deliberately bankrupting this country through the use of “fiat’ money;
q. Manipulated and biased news stories from the mainstream media that are too often designed to support the political agendas of their owners, international bankers and corporations, special interest groups and even their favorite political candidates.
r. Politicization and manipulation of science by special interest groups for political gain through the use of legal and/or economic pressure to influence the findings of scientific research and then using their own media outlets to control the way it is disseminated, reported or interpreted. Global Warming is a prime example of this process;
s. The endless cycle of war that has occurred since America became a member of the United Nations. The UN charter has allowed our politicians to send American troops into combat on foreign soil without formal Declarations of War;
t. The step by step surrender of our nation’s sovereignty to an ever expanding and un-elected United Nations bureaucracy in order to promote the need for a “New World Order” and “One World Government” under the guise of fighting common global threats against all the people of the earth including the pollution of the oceans, the aids epidemic, third world poverty, terrorism and global warming;

Unfortunately, the previous list is only a small fraction of the “threads of change” that are being woven around and through American society today by America’s enemy within. Although this traitorous network of individuals and organizations is relatively small, they have an unlimited amount of money at their disposal to use to pursue their globalist agenda.

They advance their agenda by:

1. Using their own group members currently in high government positions,
2. Using individuals and research groups financed by their own non-profit foundations, and
3. Using the media companies they own to bring pressure on government officials from several different directions at once.

The long term plan of America’s Lilliputians has been to use a small “step by step” process, or “thread by thread” change process that is designed to slowly but steadily advance their goals while at the same time going virtually unnoticed by the majority of Americans. Unfortunately, their success in implementing their goals will gradually convert the USA from a sovereign nation into a subservient position in the new world order run by non-elected, appointed bureaucrats selected by the international bankers.

The sheer numbers of these individual globalist “threads of change” that threaten America’s freedoms, liberties and sovereignty have been increasing dramatically in the last few decades. As these “threads of change” are very carefully woven deeper and deeper into the fabric of American society by the enemy within and are combined with other “threads of change,” they are steadily becoming stronger and more difficult to break.

If America fails to awaken soon to the danger that these traitorous American Lilliputians pose to this country, we too, like Lemuel Gulliver, will find ourselves totally incapacitated, without individual freedoms and liberties and unable to do anything about it. The grip of these international criminals must be broken and the threats against our liberties, freedoms and our nation’s sovereignty must be eliminated before it is too late.

If the plan of the international bankers is ultimately successful, the US constitution will gradually be superseded by international laws, rules, regulations and legal decisions of the International World Court.

If we do nothing and the traitorous Lilliputian international bankers are successful in fully implementing their globalist agenda for America, we will all be destined to be poor, overtaxed, unarmed, bound by the chains and shackles of servitude and at the mercy of our new masters.

By John W. Wallace
ttp://www.nycampaignforliberty.com/
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE BATTLE NOT OVER

Letter Received from the Republican Party:

Now that the Supreme Court has taken a pass on the issue, the action filed by United States Justice Foundation (USJF) is our best hope when it comes to compelling President-elect Obama to respect the Constitution and provide the American people viable substantiation that he is Constitutionally qualified to be President of the United States.
 
Some of what you are about to read may shock you. Some of what you read may cause you to tremble. In fact... Reading this letter may be the one of the most important things you do in your life! The sad and unfortunate truth is that your life... the liberties and freedoms we all sometimes take for granted... your future and the future of your children and grandchild actually hinges on what actions you choose to take after reading this letter. 

1. What would happen if you woke up one morning and found out that the President of the United States was a USURPER... a FRAUD... a PHONY? Think about that question for a while before you answer. Mull it over. 
2. What would happen if the leader of the free world was Constitutionally ineligible to be President of the United States but - in direct and undisputable violation of the letter of the Constitution - decided to take and hold office anyway? 
3. What would happen if a politician actually got away with such a thing? 
4. Do you believe ANY of our God-given rights would remain secure? 
5. Would any bill this Usurper signed into law be valid? 
6. Would this Usurper's Supreme Court appointments be valid? 
7. Would the military recognize this Usurper as Commander-in-Chief and what actions would those within our military take?
8. What would our enemies around the world do? 
9. What would happen to the economy... your job... your home... your assets or what you've put away for retirement?
10. Would our society destabilize uncontrollably and would we actually start down the road to anarchy?
      
Here's a scarier proposition. For years, liberal activist judges have tried to legislate from the bench and erode the Constitution, but in doing so, they have always been nuanced and careful in their approach. They found "penumbras" in the Constitution or claimed the Constitution was a "living, breathing and evolving document" so they could make a pretext of honoring the Constitution as they changed its actual meaning and slowly and almost imperceptibly eradicated the rights of the people. Would a flagrant, callous and outright disregard of the Constitution send a clear message to liberal activist judges and legislators that a nuanced approach was no longer necessary... that they could literally strip our rights, liberties and freedoms with tyrannical impunity... that the Constitution of the United States is effectively a WORTHLESS PIECE OF PAPER? 

Could the will of the people become merely something that could be ignored by those who tyrannically hold the reins of political power at the moment? If JUST ONE SECTION of our Constitution can be
flagrantly and callously ignored, IS ANY PART OF THE CONSTITUTION VALID ANYMORE? If you think I exaggerate, ponder those points for a moment and understand why President-elect Barack Obama MUST be compelled to verify that he is a "natural born citizen!" 

If President-elect Obama is NOT compelled to verify that he is Constitutionally eligible to be President of the United States, the consequences could be dire for you... for your children... for your grandchildren... and for our nation! The people of the United States do NOT directly elect the President. The people choose Electors from their respective states who, in turn, elect the President and Vice-President of the United States. THESE ELECTORS MEET ON DECEMBER 15! 

Americans in each state are being asked to please contact their state Attorney Generals to demand that they take necessary steps to ensure that the Electors from their respective states properly fulfill and execute the duties of their office and verify that President-elect Obama is a "natural born citizen" prior to casting their votes on December 15. These Electors have an obligation to uphold the Constitution. It's an obligation that supersedes their pledge to vote for a particular candidate. And moreover each of the Attorney Generals of the 50 States has an obligation as well to see to it that the Electors properly execute the duties of their office.

For the Record, we are not saying that President-elect Obama is NOT Constitutionally eligible to be President of the United States. The problem is we simply do not know! When reports surfaced that President-elect Obama's maternal grandmother was claiming that she was was present at Obama's birth in Mombasa in what is now Kenya, some people dismissed the statement as unsubstanciated. But then, a birth certificate that turned out to be a forgery made its way onto Obama's website. Why produce a forged birth certificate? Then there were the ambiguous statements from officials in Hawaii who claimed that a "Certificate of Live Birth" exists for President-elect Obama in Hawaii. 

However the laws of Hawaii allow for a child o be furnished a "Certificate of Live Birth" even if the child was NOT born in Hawaii. Specifically, the statute reads: " Certificates for children born out of State. (a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that
the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child." 

Dr. Chiyome Fukino with Hawaii's Department of Health stated: "Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawaii, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obama's original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures." But officials in Hawaii got mysteriously silent when asked; if the "Birth Certificate" listed Obama's actual place of birth. Why? Then there was the issue of college records that Obama refuses to release. Why? Could those records indicate that he received financial aid as a foreign student?

Recently Dr. Jerome Corsi traveled to Kenya to see if he could find a birth certificate for President-elect Obama but was etained by Kenyan officials. Again... Why? 

Janet Porter, writing for WorldNetDaily.com, raises even more questions: According to Porter: "In Hawaii, a Certification of Live Birth is issued within a year of a child's birth to those who register a birth abroad or one that takes place outside a hospital,' she said." "'There's the matter that Obama traveled to Indonesia, Pakistan, Southern India and Kenya in 1981. He said he went to Indonesia to see his mother. This seemed plausible, except for the fact that his mother returned to Hawaii in August of 1980 to file for a divorce from her second husband, Lolo Soetoro. Unless she went back to pal around with the man she divorced, she wasn't there at the time of Obama's visit," Porter wrote. 

There's another problem. No record of Obama holding an American passport prior to the one he received once becoming a U.S.senator has been found. If he traveled to Pakistan with an American passport, he wouldn't have been allowed in -- since Pakistan was in turmoil in 1981 and under martial law. It was also on the State Department's travel ban list for U.S. citizens,' she wrote. "'If he couldn't get into Pakistan with a U.S. passport, perhaps he went there with an Indonesian passport. But the only way you can get one of those is if you are an Indonesian citizen.'" 

And finally, one can not shake President-elect Obama's unwillingness to release an authentic copy of his birth certificate, nor can it be ignored that President-elect Obama has hired teams of attorneys (not individual attorneys but teams of attorneys) to thwart attempts by third parties to compel him to produce a birth certificate.

The question as to whether President-elect Obama is a "natural born citizen" - as REQUIRED (NOT SUGGESTED) by the Constitution - is not just significant... it's now downright compelling. And it's a question that MUST be answered! The people of the United States do NOT directly elect the President. The people choose Electors from their respective states who, in turn, elect the President and Vice-President of the United States. THESE ELECTORS MEET ON DECEMBER 15! These electors will vote in a matter of days. Time is short and under such circumstances, working your way up
the food chain quickly is a PRIORITY!
 
Some people have contacted the Electors in their states. Lynn Stuter, writing for the Internet website NewsWithViews.com, recounts what happened when she e-mailed an elector in her state. Stuter points
out: "Electors are sworn to uphold it (the Constitution) with their vote on December 15th in the Electoral College. But they must first know for sure tha the candidates meet the Constitutional requirements for the office of President beginning with being a natural born citizen." Then, Stuter gets to the meat of the matter: "I am requesting that you examine closely the information provided below before you vote on December 15, 2008. If, after being elected president, Barack Hussein Obama is found to be, in fact, ineligible, the constitutional crisis will be far reaching." "The first duty of every Elector is to the Constitution."
 
The next morning, I received the following response from one of the Electors: "'I have put you on my spam service. I will NO longer accept mail from you. I have signed an affadavit (sic) that I will vote for my parties (sic) candidate. You are asking me to go against this affadavit (sic) which not only would cause a large monetary fine but would go against the promise I made in Person (sic) to well over 1000 people.' "'In asking me to go against my written pledge which our state requires you are (sic) encourage me to do an illegal thing.' "'Most of all, I think that President-elect Obama is one of the best things to ever happen to our country. As a life long Democrat and (sic) a bi racial (sic) son who was killed in action as a soldier; it is my HONOR to cast my electoral vote for him.'"

Incidentally, while we're on the subject of Electors, we recently located what appears to be a glaring irregularity in California. In Los Angeles County, Ilene Huber is listed as the presidential elector designated in the 28th Congressional district. However, the registrar-recorder/county clerk of the county of Los Angeles, state of California, has no record of an Ilene Huber listed as a registered voter in the County of Los Angeles. Furthermore, a statewide search of public records has revealed only one Ilene Huber in the state of California, and she is deceased.
      
Other than a dead Elector there may be even more irregularities. According to WorldNetDaily.com: "... [A]ccording to Chris Myers, director of research for the California Democratic Party, who submitted the list of presidential electors for the Democratic Party to the office of the California secretary of state, there are additional, undisclosed, 'errors' in the list of electors. This admission was made in a telephone conversation with a representative of the American Independent Party on or about November 20, 2008." 

Simply stated, if the Electoral College actually allowed an unqualified person to be elected President of the United States, or allowed a person to be elected without verifying that that he or she is qualified, our entire form of government could be compromised! I don't make that statement lightly. It's not an exaggeration. Liberty and freedom are not the rule in this world. They're exceptions. In the United States, we take freedom for granted. It's a given. To us it's like breathing or walking. And that's no accident. 

Our Founding Fathers established a government under the basic premise that men "are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights." .. rights that could not be taken away because they come from a Power greater than any one of us. They believed the primary purpose of government was to secure and safeguard those rights and they enumerated those rights in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Stated in greater detail..."We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it...." 

When the most powerful among us are no longer bound by those founding documents - and, more importantly, when we refuse to hold them accountable - there can be no freedom... no liberty... only unrest...violence... oppression... tyranny... perhaps not tomorrow, but very soon! Our Founding Fathers knew that all too well. The action you take now may very well determine the future you leave to your children and grandchildren.

We have indeed crossed the Rubicon. If we do nothing... we sign the death warrant for our nation.

NOTE: The above was received form the USGOP.

Some editing of the article was conducted to remove references to contact and  fax numbers, etc.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE ISSUE REFUSES TO GO AWAY!

TRIBUNE AD CREATES STIR: BIRTH CERTIFICATE ISSUE REFUSES TO GO AWAY

By John P. Connolly, The Bulletin (Philadelphia) 12/04/2008

Despite the lack of media coverage and the derision of President-elect Barack Obama's supporters, a newspaper ad signaled that the controversy surrounding Mr. Obama's citizenship is not going away.

The We The People Foundation, an organization designed to increase understanding of the Constitution, took out two full-page ads in the Chicago Tribune calling on Mr. Obama to release his proof of natural birth and U.S. citizenship.

"Representing thousands of responsible American citizens who have also taken an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States of America, I am duty bound to call on you to remedy an apparent violation of the Constitution," read the open letter from Robert L. Schulz, the chairman of We The People.

Questions about Mr. Obama's citizenship, and by extension, his eligibility to be president, have focused around Mr. Obama's unwillingness to release his original birth certificate. The lack of evidence in the controversy was cited by the letter as the root of concern from citizens over the fate of the presidency.

"In consideration of the escalating constitutional crisis brought on by the total lack of evidence needed to conclusively establish your eligibility, I am compelled to serve you with this First Amendment Petition for a redress of this violation of the Constitution," stated the ad. "With all due respect, I ask that you immediately direct the appropriate Hawaiian officials to allow access to the vault copy of your birth certificate by our forensic scientists on Friday, Saturday and Sunday, Dec. 5, 6 and 7, 2008."

The ads were met with derision by the Chicago Sun-Times columnist Mary Mitchell, who cited a document put on the Internet by the Obama campaign in the summer as proof for why Mr. Obama is a natural born U.S. citizen.

The document that was put on Mr. Obama's "Fight the Smears" Web site was not a birth certificate, but a birth certification, which is a computer generated print-off of information taken from a normal birth certificate. Further, critics assert that there is evidence that puts the low-quality scan in question.

A meeting of Supreme Court justices will decide on Dec. 5 whether or not to hear one of multiple cases over the release of Mr. Obama's birth certificate. The lawsuit filed by Leo C. Donofrio against the Secretary of State of New Jersey is scheduled for a meeting of the justices, and should four of them vote in favor of the case, hearings would be scheduled. Mr. Donofrio also wants a similar case from a Connecticut court heard by the Supreme Court at the same time.Mr.

Donofrio applied to the Supreme Court after the Supreme Court of New Jersey dismissed his case. His first application was to Justice David Souter, who denied the application. Mr. Donofrio then applied to Justice Clarence Thomas, who scheduled Friday's meeting.

According to the U.S. Constitution, "no person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of president."

In Pennsylvania, attorney Philip J. Berg filed a suit against Mr. Obama and the Democratic National Committee in August, in the hopes that Mr. Obama would produce his original birth certificate. Mr. Berg says he believes Mr. Obama was born in Kenya.The case was thrown out of the Third Circuit Court in November because the judge ruled Mr. Berg had no standing to enforce the presidential requirements of the Constitution. Mr. Berg has since filed a writ requesting the Supreme Court hear his case, and Mr. Obama waived his right to respond to the writ.

The Court has not yet decided whether or not it will hear Mr. Berg's case.

John P. Connolly can be reached at jconnolly@thebulletin.us
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

PRESIDENT ELECT OBAMA: PLEASE RELEASE YOUR BIRTH RECORDS

I know you are busy setting up your new administration as the President elect of the greatest country in the world, but there are a couple of things about your background and qualifications for the office that concern me and many of my fellow Americans. Never before has a Presidential candidate failed to fully disclose routine information about their background.

It seems that many records concerning your background have either been sealed or are temporarily unavailable for review. I know that any honest person like yourself, who is about to assume the highest office in the land, would never overtly want to keep such information from public review.

Here's a partial list:

1. College records from Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard -- Not available and secured by college administrators.
2. Columbia Thesis paper -- not available, secured by college administrators
3. Certified Copy of original Birth certificate - Not released (sealed?)
4. Certified Copy of Certification of Live Birth -- Not released (sealed?)

I believe items #3 and 4 are the most critical and they concern two issues that are very important to the American people:

1. Are Are you a Natural Born Citizen of the U.S.? and
2. Are you legally qualified to hold the Office of President?

There have been several lawsuits filed, or currently being filed, in 7 or 8 states with various state Boards of Elections, claiming you are ineligible to be on their ballots because you have not produced proof that you are a natural born citizen of the United States.


As you may recall, there was a Cetificate of Live Birth (COLB) for you posted on your campaign website in the past that was reported as an original, but which was later found to be only an abstract of a computer record having no connection to the original 1961 COLB document. The abstract copy was later taken down.

In an election of a President, where being a "Natural Born Citizen" is a requirement for the position, I believe that the American people have a right to know if you are a natural born citizen.

What does the actual original document say about the birth? What hospital were you born in? Who was the attending physician? What was the date and time? What names are listed on the COLB? I think the question of your birth is a very important constitutional issue and the issue should be publicly put to rest one way or the other.

Mr Obama, it seems that you are creating needless confusion when you could easily avoid all of this doubt simply by asking for release of your original 1961 document and let it be examined. Why haven't you done this? and why have you fought against every attempt to produce the document?

Mr. Obama, if you are truly and honorable man and a "Natural Born Citizen of the United States" you can clear up this issue very quickly. Just sign a release to have the full document examined and made available for public scrutiny.

Your continued avoidance of the issue and your subsequent failure to provide proof that you are a "Natural Born Citizen of the United States" is very suspicious and raises a very important constitutional issue that must be addressed before you take office. I am asking you to stop using legal technicalities, record sealing and courtroom maneuvers to avoid the issue. The American people have every constitutional right to know whether or not you are a "Natural Born Citizen" and they will eventually find out.

Let's put this issue to rest once and for all so we can get on with the American people's business.

John Wallace
www.NYCampaignforLiberty.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »